My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03680
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC03680
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:35:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:07:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
5000.300
Description
Flood Protection Section - Mudflow Mitigation Plan - 1987
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/1/1987
Title
Colorado Landslide Hazard Mitigation Plan - 1987 - Preliminary Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002823 <br /> <br />A warning system may include the monitoring of conditions with potential for <br />causing a catastrophic event (e.g., snowpack, storm development) and signs <br />instructing people within the potentially hazardous area of proper procedures <br />(figure ). Automatic sensors, located within slide-prone areas, with <br />effective linkages to a central communication warning facility and, thence, to <br />individuals with disaster management responsibilities, are sometimes used. <br /> <br />Emergency operations include evacuation, shelter and care, cleanup, and <br />provision of essential services and activities. Subsequently, during the <br />rehabilitation/recovery stage, the actual response is evaluated and planning <br />and preparation activities are modified accordingly. <br /> <br />An emergency preparedness system can be an effective tool for protecting <br />present inhabitants of landslide hazard areas. Unfortunately, the technique <br />is limited in its ability to protect property and facilities at risk. <br /> <br />Table 5.1 lists a variety of techniques that can be used to modify the <br />vulnerability of the cOl1DDunity to lands1iding. Appendix "B" discusses these <br />techniques in greater detail. <br /> <br />Modifying the Physical System <br /> <br />Physical modification is undertaken where human infringement on an unstable <br />area already poses an unacceptable risk, but where measures such as zoning are <br />precluded by the cost of resettlement, value or scarcity of land, or vested <br />traditional rights. Physical measures can be directed toward either control <br />and stabilization or protective functions. <br /> <br />When selecting and designing physical mitigation measures, it should be <br />recognized that it is not possible, feasible, or even necessarily desirable to <br />prevent all slope movements. Furthermore, some landslide areas that <br />potentially could be mitigated may not be developed when the cost of <br />mitigation is balanced against other alternatives such as the availability of <br />other sites. <br /> <br />Precautions concerning over-reliance on physical methods: Large <br />hazard-control structures are costly and require lead time for planning and <br />design, land acquisition, permitting, and construction. Structures also may <br /> <br />- 38 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.