My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03626
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC03626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:35:45 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:06:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.720
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations-Entities - US Bureau of Reclamation
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/28/1945
Author
CWCB
Title
Statement of the State of Colorado - By the CWCB - Concerning Report on Colorado River Basin in Preparation by Bureau of Reclamation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001436 <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />19~. the Bureau of Reclamation transmitted to Congress en Inventory of Pro- <br />jects considered suitable for construction in the postwar period in all the <br />stream basins of the Seventeen Hestern states. Colorado suggests that the <br />initial list of projeots to be designated in the Report be selected from <br />said Inventory of Postwar Projects. and consist of all those considered <br />suitable for postwar construction which can be cperated without thereby <br />causing the beneficial oonsumptive use of waters of the Colorado River sys- <br />tem from exceeding the quantities of water heretofore apportioned for such <br />use to the Upper Basin and to the Lower Basin by Art. III (a) and (b) ~ <br />the ColoradO River Compact. and without thereby causing the flow of the <br />Colorado River at Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75.000.000 <br />aore feet for any period of 'ten conseouti ve years. as provided by Art, III <br />(d) of said compact. and without thereby causinz the beneficial consumptive <br />use of water in anyone state of the Upper Division from exoeeding the <br />quantity of water which that state contributed under virgin conditions to <br />the waters of the ColoradO River system. provided that this shall not be <br />construed as relieving any state from delivering its fair share at Lee <br />Ferry to make gOOd the terms of the Colorado River Compact. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />11. Directing attention, next, to revisions of the Report to improve <br />its value to the citizens and states of the ColoradO River Basin. ColoradO <br />admits that the intrastate. interstate and international problems mention- <br />ed therein must eventually be solved before the final stages of ultimate <br />development are reached. but denies that such problems should be under- <br />taken or can be solved all at once and promptly, as stated or :iJnplied by <br />the Report. On the oontrary ColoradO asserts" and suggests the Report be <br />revised to show,- that such problems are inter-related and the solutions <br />of some are dependent on the previous solutions of others; that such prob- <br />lems must be and are being solved one at a time. or in stages, and in an <br />orderly manner as they are confr'onted; that solutions of recognized prob- <br />lems. as vre11 Mothers 't? arise in the future, are dependent in part on <br />data being and to be compiled by the Bureau of Rec lame.tion, in addition <br />to that summarized in the Report; and that decisions on some of the prob- <br />lems cannot be made until further development has been acoomplished by <br />additional construction in the basin. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />12. In support of the foregoing general suggestions. attention is <br />directed, first, to the intrastate problems that are said to await solu- <br />tions by Colorado and its citizens, namely, of making selections from the <br />potential projects or development possibilities listed in the Report. As <br />the Report points out. additional detailed investigations and individual <br />project feasibi lity reports will be needed to determine relative merits,. <br />and hence are necessary before the requested final selections can be <br />made. Oolorado asserts that, during the period of more than sixteen years <br />since the Boulder Canyon Project Act was adopted. which authorized the <br />making of such investigations and reports" the Bureau of Reclamation has <br />completed them for less than 20 percent of the potential projects or <br />knowrr development possibilities in Colorado; that, until such investiga- <br />tions and reports are completed by the Bureau of Reclamation for the ra- <br />Ill8ining more than 80 percent of the possible Colorado projects, the <br />State and its citizens cannot fully solve their intrastate problems nor <br />make the final selections requested in the Report; and that such selec- <br /> <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.