My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03491
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
15000-15999
>
WSPC03491
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:35:14 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:58:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106.O
Description
Colorado River Water Projects - Animas La Plata - Project Funding
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/2003
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Animas La Plata Project - Construction Cost Estimates - Report to the Secretary - November 2003
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. factors and proposed changes included in developing the 2003 PCE. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. a comparison of feature and key component costs between the 1999 and <br />2003 PCE (Appendix 4 provides a detailed cost comparison); and <br /> <br />The review also examined the contracting process associated with P.L. 93-638, <br />the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEA or 638), to <br />determine if any additional costs arising from this process were projected and <br />included in the 1999 project cost analysis. <br /> <br />In addition, Reclamation's processes and organizational approaches during the <br />planning, formulation, design and initial construction phases of the Project were <br />reviewed to determine what, if any, role these factors played prior to and after the <br />1999 PCE was developed. <br /> <br />Finally, the interaction and communication with sponsors since 1999 was <br />considered to determine whether processes (e.g. Project Coordination Committee) <br />that were established to facilitate coordination and cooperation worked. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />A. Events Leading to Development of the 1999 Cost Estimate <br /> <br />When originally authorized, the Animas-La Plata Project consisted oftbree <br />reservoirs, 48 miles of canals and tunnels, and a diversion from the Animas River <br />at Taft, upstream of Durango, Colorado. The Project was authorized to provide <br />irrigation and M&I water supplies to the Colorado Ute Tribes and other project <br />beneficiaries. However, the Project was modified through planning and <br />environmental processes over the next 30 years in response to environmental, <br />Indian water rights, legal and cost issues. The first Environmental Impact <br />Statement (ElS) was filed in July 1980 (1980 EIS). <br /> <br /> <br />In 1988, Congress required construction of certain features of the Project to settle <br />Colorado Ute Tribal water rights claims. A special report on the Project in 1988 <br />included cost estimates at October 1985 prices. Planning continued on the <br />Project, but construction was further postponed because new information <br />triggered Endangered Species Act consultation from early 1990 through late <br />1991. Groundbreaking for the Project occurred in October 1991, but construction <br />plans were halted in April 1992 by an environmental lawsuit. <br /> <br />As a result, Reclamation prepared and filed a final supplemental EIS <br />(1996 FSEIS) in April 1996 after prolonged work to address environmental issues <br />associated with the litigation. Project re-pricing was initiated in 1993 to reflect <br />current costs and proposed refinements to the Project. Reclamation used this <br />information to prepare the 1996 cost estimate associated with the 1996 FSEIS. <br />The cost estimate information was available to and used by the Ute Mountain Ute <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.