Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />over time. Unit prices are designed to reflect the current ~id value for construction. Estimates <br />should be periodically re-priced due to changes in equipment, design, and construction <br />techniques that continually affect the unit prices. Changes in laws are also continually occurring <br />which result in additional )Vork or changes in construction practices. As a result, the Rls <br />contained a recommendation that "Cost indices should not be applied to cost estimates over <br />5 years old; the estimates should be re-priced" (RI Part 150, Chapter 152,1993). <br /> <br />For long-term projects, Reclamation periodically (typically after no more than 5 years) <br />re-estimates the PCE for the remaining features. This is done to ensure an accurate projection of <br />budget needs is available to be compared to remaining appropriations ceiling to assure that PCEs <br />reflect the latest and most accurate information available about the project, and that the prices <br />used in the estimate reflect the current costs ofthe construction where the project is located. <br />This updated estimate is then compared to the remaining appropriations ceiling to ensure <br />sufficient funding is available to complete the project. <br /> <br />The PCE is a vital tool that impacts project construction schedules, repayment contracts, cost <br />sharing agreements, and Reclamation's annual appropriations request. PCEs are typically <br />prepared by the Reclamation Area Office with project jurisdiction in consultation with <br />construction cost estimators, and sp'ecialists in land, environmental, and cultural aspects of <br />projects. Regional Directors assign staffto track project expenditures on a monthly basis and <br />compute remaining appropriations (with or without indexing as prescribed by the project <br />authorization) during budget formulation with a comparison to actual costs incurred. Regional <br />staff also prepares annual budget requests with a goal of completing projects within their region <br />in accordance with each project's authorizing legislation. A Reclamation-wide Budget Review <br />Committee considers all such requests and develops Reclamation's annual budget request. This <br />process is repeated each year and provides the agency with a means to address project and <br />agency-wide budget needs in a reasonably flexible manner. <br /> <br />If these processes reveal potential appropriations ceiling concerns, cost containment measures <br />are evaluated with the project stakeholders and, if necessary, additional legislation is sought to <br />address the future budget and appropriations needs. <br /> <br />Recent Experience With Project Management Process: The Dam Safety Program is managed <br />on a Reclamation-wide basis. Projecting current projects through the end of2004, 65 SOD <br />construction projects will have been completed. Ofthese projects, 16 exceeded their estimated <br />cost by more than 10 percent. The total estimated cost presented to the Congress in the <br />Modification Reports for these 65 projects is just under $1.1 billion. The actual cost to complete <br />the projects was $927 million (about 86 percent oftotal estimated cost). <br /> <br />2-5 <br />