Laserfiche WebLink
<br />16 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />sufficiently to expose under-estimates of quantities and types of material <br />respectively. <br /> <br />Changes and lack of clarity in roles and responsibilities in Reclamation in tlte <br />mid-1990's definitely increased Reclamation's susceptibility to failing to <br />complete initial reviews and further scrubbing of the cost estimate. There was <br />and is a lack of clarity about roles within the organization in managing <br />construction. Prior to the mid-1990's Reclamation's Denver TSC provided direct <br />oversight on design and estimation of Project construction costs. Today, these <br />services are provided only at the request of Area Offices or other units managing <br />construction. <br /> <br />The objective and focus of both Reclamation and Project proponents to complete <br />the project within 7 years as allowed for in the law and the lack of a Project <br />ceiling in the 2000 authorization further set the stage for limited scrubbing of the <br />cost analysis. <br /> <br />Finally, a significant increase in the 2003 cost estimate is associated with a lack of <br />recognition of the potential impact of the ISDEA contracting process to increase <br />construction costs. Both Reclamation and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe share <br />responsibility for failing to include this component in Appendix E (1999 PCE) of <br />the 2000 FSEIS. Reclamation's 2003 PCE includes the EDF factor to project the <br />expected costs associated with the ISDEA contracting process. However, it is <br />clear that this is a conservative estimate that is based in part on the results of <br />contracting for about 3 percent of the original Project construction estimate of <br />$337 Million. There is some optimism that the actual amount could be less for <br />the remainder ofthe Project as Reclamation, the Tribe and other Project sponsors <br />work more closely on Project implementation. <br /> <br />Despite the identified cost increases, the need for the Animas-La Plata Project <br />remains. It is critical that the Project continue to move forward to satisfy the <br />Indian Water Rights Settlement and meet future non-Indian municipal water <br />supply needs in southwestern Colorado and northwestern New Mexico. <br /> <br />NEXT STEPS: Reclamation has completed or is taking several initial steps to <br />manage and cornplete the Animas-La Plata Project in the most cost effective and <br />efficient way possible. These actions, when fully implemented, will provide the <br />safeguards necessary to avoid similar occurrences on this and other Reclamation <br />Projects in the future. <br /> <br />. The basic construction cost estimate for the Project has been redone by <br />Reclamation. Efforts will continue to save costs during scheduling of <br />construction and final design of components of the Project. <br />