Laserfiche WebLink
<br />( <br /> <br />0;)2329 <br /> <br />\ <br />I <br /> <br />32 ASSEMBLY INTERIM COMMITTEE ON WATEIt <br /> <br />the Department of the Interior in projecting the futur~,rate of Upper <br />Colorado River Basin depletions reflect, almost entirely, dJfferent judg- <br />ments as to: " <br /> <br />1. The scope and bmIng of construction of Federal R\clamation <br />projects in the Upper Basin. <br />2. The magnitude and timing of future industrial demands for water <br />such as represented by the oil shale industry. <br />3. The magnitude and timing of future municipal and domestic <br />water demands. ' , <br /> <br />Such differences in estimated. development raise uncertaip.tiesl{!i1 va: <br />rious areas as to anticipated future supplies. Until the. estinyttes of <br />the state and federal agencies are more nearly agreed we ca<llnot be <br />certain as to when critical shortages will occur. As is described,.below, <br />estimated Upper Basin development particularly, is a maj<;>:r factor in <br />determining silpplies available to the Lower Basin. .' .. .. <br />These differences between the projections of UpPcJr Basin de~~lqp- <br />ment by the two agencies are summarized in the foll/owing tabulation: <br />I . . <br />Colorado River Department of <br />Board of Calif. * Interior * , <br />(1.000 A.F.) (1,00fl)iF~f <br />? <br />1975 __________ 4,300 4,000 <br />1990 __________ "',400 4,900 <br />2000 _________ _ 5,700 .5,430 <br />. Total for re!"..jervolr losses and other depletions. <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />Difference <br />(i,OdO A:F.) : <br />306 <br />500 <br />270, <br /> <br />Thp",lJepartment of the Interior's projection, in general, envisages an <br />;illcrease over historic trends in the ratc. of Upper Basin depletions ,until <br />the year 1975. Such an increase obviously will result from the construc- <br />tion and operation of federal projects authorized in recent years, <br />principally the Colorado River Storage Project and participatipg proj- <br />ects, the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, and the San Juan-Chama and <br />Navajo Indian Irrigation Projects. After 1975 the department expects <br />the 1960-1975 rate of increased depletion to reduce until the year:20dO, <br />after which it will further tend to level off 'as the Upper Basin ap- <br />proaches full use of its share of Colorado River Basin water. <br />The impact of this expected development, coupled with natural flows <br />expected in the river for use in both the upper and lower basins is dis- <br />cussed in the sections below. . . <br /> <br />COlORADO RIVER WATER SUPPLY <br /> <br />The Colorado is characterized by uneven and. unpredictable flows. <br />A vaiIable flow data indicates that the flow has varied from 4,;39~,400 <br />acre-feet in 1934 to 22,~03,000 acre-feet in 1907. The. ;river's early l:1is~ <br />tory was marked by "vIOlent floods causing great damage." 9 In addi- <br />tion to erratic flow, prior to construction of Hoover.and Glen 'Cil.llyon <br />Dams, the river carried large quantities of silt, estimated during the <br />suit, ArizO'na v. California, as being "proportionately 17 times that of <br />the Mississippi River." 10 . <br /> <br />9 Report of Special Master, op. cU." at 18. <br />10 Ibid." at 20. <br />