Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001997 <br /> <br />o Flows- of 35 cfs at Platoro Reservoir and 100 cfs at the <br />Highway 17 bridge during the summer months, and natural <br />flows during winter months, were considered necessary <br />to accomplish the purposes of designation. Summer <br />flows drop below those recommended on occassion. Thus, <br />it was suggested that the Forest Service should issue <br />no further permits for water development projects on <br />its lands. <br /> <br />o Acquisition of existing water rights was not <br />recommended. <br /> <br />o No conflict with the Rio Grande Compact was <br />anticipated. <br /> <br />o Campground rehabilitation and replacement would occur. <br /> <br />o Reconstruction of 25.6 miles of trail would be <br />required. <br /> <br />o A Recreational Forester would be required to administer <br />the area. <br /> <br />o A capital investment of $1,900,000 and an annual <br />maintenance and administrative cost of $111,000 would <br />be required. <br /> <br />current Leqislation (5. .1084) <br /> <br />S. 1084 would delete a two-mile segment below Platoro <br />Reservoir, which was recommended for designation in the final <br />study report. This would eliminate several tracts of private <br />land from designation. <br /> <br />Ibm <br /> <br />-3- <br />