My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03077
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
15000-15999
>
WSPC03077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:33:46 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:44:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062
Description
Federal Water Rights - Colorado Litigation - National Forest ISF Claims - Division 2
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/1/1996
Author
CWCB
Title
Materials of Interest - Development of Instream Flow Recommendations in Colorado Using R2CROSS - CWCB
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />001940 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ii <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1\ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 2, Criteria used to determine minimum flow requirements using the R2CROSS <br />single transect method (Nehring 1979) <br /> <br />Stream Top Average Percent Wetted Average <br />Width (ft)' Denth (ft) Perimeter (%)1 Velocity (ft/sec) <br />1-20 0,2 50 1.0 <br />21-40 0.2-0.4 50 1.0 <br />41-60 0.4-0,6 50-60 1.0 <br />61-100 0,6-1.0 ~70 1.0 <br />I At bankfull discharge, <br /> <br />based upon biologic considerations such as <br />stream conditions, species composition, and <br />aquatic habitat quality. <br />These hydraulic criteria can be applied <br />to the R2CROSS staging table from the Iron <br />Creek example (Figure I) to develop an initial <br />biologic instream flow recommendation. In this <br />example, the grassline top width of Iron Creek <br />is 9,97 ft. Therefore, the DOW criteria for an xd <br />of 0,2 feet would be satisfied at a flow of <br />approximately 0,6 cfs, The %WP criterion of <br />50% would be met at a flow of around 1.75 cfs <br />and an x of 1 ft/sec at a flow of 2.25 cfs, <br />v <br />Based upon this analysis, a winter flow <br />recommendation of 1.75 cfs would meet the xd <br />and % WP criteria and a summer flow <br />recommendation of 2,25 cfs would satisfy all <br />three criteria, These initial recommendations <br />may be adjusted up or down based upon <br />biologic judgment and expertise. <br /> <br />Water Availability Requirements <br /> <br />Once an initial biologic instream flow <br />recommendation has been developed, the <br />CWCB staff must determine whether water is <br />physically available to satisfy the biologic <br />recommendation, The staff uses stream gaging <br /> <br />records to analyze physical water availability <br />whenever possible. In the absence of a gage <br />record, the staff may use standardized <br />hydrologic techniques, such as areal <br />apportionment or synthetic streamflow <br />modeling (Kircher et al. 1985), to estimate <br />physical water availability, The staff may also <br />conduct a review of the State Engineer's water <br />rights tabulation and consult with Division <br />Engineers and District Water Commissioners to <br />determine the effect of senior diversions on a <br />stream reach. <br />The water availability analyses may lead <br />the CWCB staff to conclude that sufficient <br />water is not available to meet the biologic <br />recommendation, In that situation, the CWCB <br />staff may request that the cooperating agency <br />reconsider its biologic recommendation and <br />determine whether the natural environment can <br />be preserved with the amount of water <br />available, If the natural environment can be <br />preserved with the available water, the instream <br />flow recommendation may be revised to reflect <br />the lower available flow amounts, If the <br />statutory water availability requirement cannot <br />be satisfied, the CWCB must reject the instream <br />flow recommendation, <br /> <br />-19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.