Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, 0015~~ <br /> <br />~. ".l ..... ...... ;It l".;,I".'" <br /> <br />'Ill ..; ~~".Joi' I~ AG(,"" <br /> <br />----- -- -- .--.-------.. - <br />.- - .... ._...- ---- - . .... - .... <br /> <br />.-:.;~~.:~;J:.= .:.' .11:,,'" J I <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />- . . <br />.' .... .. . __.a. <br /> <br />--.-" <br />/, . <br />t...::..~ ~ . <br />".J.J. ' <br />~. <br /> <br /><:CLCRADO RIVr:R BOARD OF CAlifORNIA <br />;~1 ')0urtt C;HO"OWA't. !lrAM 1110) <br />."4(,(U5. CAl.ltORNIA 'KlCU2 <br />. 610 -4.&00 <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN 0 U t<! January 28, :('913J <br /> <br />'I4t<>Wzy~ <br />TO: l1embers, Colorado River Basin Saliz:.~ ':f <"7J.s.."s'"... <br />Control ForUfol anel t-lork G P "{("I - .1'/(71(,0(".. <br />-. 'I.. ;r;,:>/.~ <br />t........ I " ,~ / <br />SUBJECT: Salinity Coni;rol - Cost. Sharing C,,~!:.~J...~.:.";:;, :~'~f" ~,//' <br />.~::".... '.'i"';-~ . c. J); <br />"1" '-{J:"It. <br />I..;.... ty;:'.. <br />. ./.. .'i.';:.'__ <br />:1' :' ,"''''i' ........ <br />COl?ics oS: Lhc h-'Ji:;lal.ivo rcpor.I,:# un r,,'n..h: ni II ::. .2,,02 <br />were sent. t.o you on December 30, 1962 uy Jack UarncLt. J.n <br />his memorandum of January 14, 1983, Jack iuentified four <br />major issues which may require analy~is anel I?olicy decisions <br />by t.he Forum. Jack and I discussed the four issues anel it <br />was agreeel that I would analyze the I?roposed changes in <br />cost sharing requested by the Administration. <br /> <br />Jack has askeel Int.erior and .'I.gri.:ulture for additional <br />information on this item. I decieled to senel this ~eQoranelum <br />anel we will forw~rel an1 other information as soon as we re- <br />. ceive it.' <br /> <br />. Background <br /> <br />The thrust of t.he statements maele by InteL'ior \'lit.:' ce- <br />spect to cost sharing is to retain the 7S perc~nt fed~:al <br />anel 2S percent non-federal cost sharing for the C:lnl.ir~ <br />salinity control progr~m, but to have tho non-federal ~:'are <br />either paiel as ul?-S:ront S:inancing or to be paid over S~ yeacs <br />with interest at the average federal long-term inte~est cost. <br />The iml?act of these alternatives was analyzed using infor- <br />mation developed by the salt routing model used for t~e Forum <br />salinity projections, assu:ninq a long term de('endable -:ield <br />of 14 million acre-feet per year anel a continuation of the <br />low rate of basin development. Based on t.his analysis, the <br />full impact on the River's salinity of upstream develo~;ne"t <br />would occur in the year 2020. <br /> <br />The t.hree authorizeel :.alinity control uniLs, Crand Valle". <br />ParadolC Valley and Las Vegas \"lash, are I?roject.ed to rO".10ve - <br />about 660,000 tons annually. In order to maintain th~ Dumari: <br />criteria, an additional 1.4 million tons of ~a1t. mu~t be pre- <br />vented from entering tl1e river system. <br /> <br />. <br />