Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />\ <br />, <br />, 002302 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Summary of Legal Authority and Debt-Servicing <br />Concept for Rate-Setting for Industrial <br />Water Service from Storage Reservoirs <br />Colorado River Storage Project <br /> <br />The industrial water service rate policy under which the Bureau of Reclamation <br />has been marketing water was set by an October 15, 1965, memorandum by the <br />Commissioner of Reclamation. This rate policy was predicated on the existing <br />law; the then - current Administration policy; a desire to raise the rate; <br />a belief in the desirability of having a uniform rate for M&I service from <br />all mainstem reservoirs; and a concern about the water diversion quantity <br />lagging behind estimates. The new policy is based on these same premises <br />and objectives. In addition, the present Administration is actively pursuing <br />the elimination of all subsidy to industrial water users. The debt servicing <br />concept is responsive to that goal. <br /> <br />The new policy calculates the present worth of the Federal investment for <br />consumptive uses from the storage units based on lO-year Treasury rates. <br />The rate derived will be reviewed and adjusted at 5-year intervals through <br />the life of a contract. <br /> <br />The 1965 policy was based on water available for depletion by diversion; the <br />new policy represents a fine-tuning. The old policy cited a gradual buildup <br />and the need to offset low revenues during the buildup and meet interest <br />costs; the new policy merely expands and updates interest costs for the pur- <br />pose of rate setting. The former policy was calculated on the basis of con- <br />struction costs allocated to consumptive uses; present policy uses the present <br />worth of those same costs. Both policies propose to continue charging for <br />M&I water service after repayment of appropriate costs has been accomplished <br />and those revenues are apportioned according to the law under both; the only <br />departure is a required 5-year adjustment which is a policy change which <br />has occurred in the 17 years since the original rate policy. <br /> <br />There is nothing in the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) Act that either <br />authorizes or prohibits the use of the cost of servicing the debt related to <br />the unpaid costs allocated to consumptive uses of water as the basis for <br />establishing rates charged for industrial water service. <br /> <br />The intent of the language in Sections 5(d) and 5(f) of the CRSP Act relating <br />to interest rates was to specify the way interest to be paid to the Treasury <br />by the Basin Fund would be calculated and was not intended to specify or limit <br />the basis of interest rate on or process by which charges for industrial water <br />service would be set or adjusted. <br /> <br />Moreover, Section 6 of the CRSP Act leaves the allocation of the total costs <br />of each unit, project, or feature among various authorized uses completely <br />within the Secretary's discretion. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />G .-;2 }-g .<~ <br /> <br /> <br />/'-" <br /> <br />A <br />:....,........ <br />