Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 C) I~ "l <br />I- d,: <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br />United States v. New Mexico, 438 U.S. 696 (1979); <br /> <br />Compare McClanahan v. Arizona Tax Comm'n, 411 U.S. <br /> <br />164, 168 (1973) and Bryan v. Itasca County, 420 <br />U.S. 373, 376 and n.2 (1976) with Kleppe v. New <br />Mexico, 426 U.S. 529, 543 (1976), Collins v. <br />Yosemite Park and Curry Co., 304 U.S. 518 (1938), <br />and California v. United States, 438 U.S. 645 (1978); <br /> <br />See also, Solicitor's Opinion #M-36914, June 25, <br />1979, "Federal Water Rights of the National Park <br /> <br />Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of <br /> <br />Reclamation and the Bureau of Land Management". <br /> <br />(iii) Appropriation of federal water riqhts by the United <br />States on federal lands - An alternative method for <br />ac uir1n federal water ri hts outslOe of the <br />parameters 0 state law: <br /> <br />Federal Appropriative Water Rights compared to <br />Federal Reserved Water Rights: <br /> <br />United States Constitution - <br /> <br />Art. 1 S8 (Commerce Clause authorizes federal <br /> <br />navigation servitude); <br /> <br />Art. IV S3 (Property Clause authorizes federal <br />regulation of federal lands); <br />Solicitor's Opinion #M-369l4 June 25, 1979; <br />Federal Land Policy and Management Act, 43 U.S.C. <br /> <br />S170l, et. seq.; <br />