Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />4247 <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />needed storage and diversion facilities and (ii) to develop <br /> <br />an equitable allocation plan to allow the future industrial <br /> <br />and municipal water needs of the Rocky Mountain region to be <br /> <br />met from available Indian water as well as state water. <br /> <br />See GAO report, "Reserved Water Rights for Federal <br /> <br />and Indian Reservations: A Growing Controversy in <br /> <br />Need of Resolution" (Nov. 1978). <br /> <br />B. NATURE AND SCOPE OF INDIAN RESERVED RIGHTS. <br /> <br />(i) Origin of the right: <br /> <br />Winters v. United States, 207 U.s. 564 (1908); <br /> <br />Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963); <br /> <br />Cappaert v. United States; 426 U.S. 128 <br /> <br />(1 07&:: \ . <br />,_... r"" , <br /> <br />See Pe1cyger, "The Winters Doctrine and the <br />Greening of the Reservations", 4 J. Contemp.L. <br /> <br /> 19 (1977); Pelcyger, "Indian Water Rights: <br /> Some Emerging Frontiers", 21 Rocky Mt. Min. L. <br /> Inst. 743 (1976) . <br />(ii) Nature and scope of the right: <br /> The ,reserved right doctrine applies to all <br /> <br />Indian reservations: <br /> <br />Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963); <br /> <br />United States v. Walker River Irrigation District, <br /> <br />104 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1939). <br />