Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />0947 <br /> <br />Session I: Western Water Trends and Directions <br /> <br />Institutional Reform <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The trend in water law throughout the West is away from rigid rights and <br />strict enforcement and toward improved management. The tribes' role in <br />this trend is significant. Tribal control (local control) of water also fits with <br />the ideal of watershed management. Tribes participate at this level as well. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />It is a fundamental tenet of Indian law that Indians can control the people <br />and territory within their reservations. In the exercise of sound stewardship <br />and their sovereign powers, tribes enact and enforce water codes. <br />Unfortunately, the approval of these codes by the United States government <br />has been stalled by a moratorium that has been in effect since June 1975. <br />More than two decades ago, a few western states successfully put political <br />pressure on the Department of the Interior, and the moratorium they <br />achieved persists today. The moratorium responded to the concerns that <br />tribes would manage water in ways that were contrary to the interests of <br />non-Indian water users. Tribes themselves may be able to overcome the <br />moratorium problem without a change in federal policy. They can simply <br />amend their tribal constitutions to remove the requirement of secretarial <br />approval of those codes. The Secretary apparently will approve this <br />amendment. Does this mean that there is no policy problem? There is a <br />policy problem so long as the trustee reaffirms, year after year, by its <br />inaction, that it will not approve tribal water codes. Maybe this refusal does <br />not rise to the magnitude of a breach of trust, but it is at least a timid <br />politically response, It ignores the contributions that tribes can make to the <br />overall improvement of water management in the West. <br /> <br />Many tribes have adopted laws that enable them to control water quality as <br />allowed under the federal Clean Water Act. History will record with favor <br />the steadfast insistence of the Isleta Pueblo that the city of Albuquerque <br />treat its sewage, and the efforts of the Salish and Kootenai tribes of the <br />Flathead nation to preserve the purity of Flathead Lake. These are not <br />excesses or unreasonable assertions of tribal authority, but exercises in <br />sound stewardship and other tribes should follow their examples. I presume <br />that the Supreme Court will uphold the EPA's approval of the Isleta water <br />quality program. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The interconnectedness of what happens throughout a watershed from <br />headwaters to estuaries and from peak to peak is being reflected in a trend <br />throughout the West, The trend is toward watershed management. People <br />within drainages are joining together to solve their own water problems. <br />Tribes, when given the opportunity, have well-managed entire drainages <br />encompassed within their reservations. The Warm Springs effort at <br />integrated resource management-management of all resources in the <br />reservation environment for generations into the future, is a good example, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />11 <br />