Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ ') <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />:'1[1,3335 <br /> <br />This the smallest, landslide in the area is similar in some respects to the <br />Dowds No.1 Landslide. Large blocky material derived from the Minturn <br />Formation predominates with a clay and sand matrix. Field work indicates that <br />landslide material above the slump that recently temporarily closed the road <br />is in a very unstable and precarious position. It should be expected that <br />such slumping will continue and that road closures will happen again. <br />However, it appears as if there is not enough highly unstable material in this <br />Jands1ide to form a landslide dam of the Eagle River. Nevertheless, this <br />Jands1ide will continue to be a threat to the Interstate, The construction <br />work done so far to reduce this threat will probably not be very effective, <br />and continuing problems in this area should be expected, <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The Dowds Junction landslide investigation is not complete, The <br />instrumentation systems that were installed became operational too late in the <br />season to make definitive evaluations and recommendations based on data <br />obtai ned from them. In addi ti on, the inoperative i nc1 i nometer at the Whi skey <br />Creek landslide should be replaced before next season to complete the <br />monitoring capability there as was originally planned, <br /> <br />At Meadow Mountain the most prudent and conservative course of action to <br />reduce landslide potential will be to continue to keep as much surface water <br />off the landslide as possible. This will entail draining of the one ephemeral <br />pond and mi nimi zi ng water flows in natural drainages and i rri gati on di tches. <br />As a longer term data base from the monitoring system is developed it should <br />gecome apparent which parts of the Meadow Mountain landslide are actively <br />~oving and most threatening, At that time permanent adjustments to the <br />"ilrainagecou1d be made based on more complete information. This should <br />satisfy the concerns of the U.S. Forest Service that relate both to their <br />potential liability and to water and grazing issues. It should be anticipated <br />that losses of highway service caused by this landslide will recur. Upgrading <br />of the detour around the slide area should be considered by the affected <br />government units. <br /> <br />The Dowds No.1 landslide should be carefully monitored, with weekly <br />readings as a minimum, during the 1986 snowmelt runoff season. If increased <br />water levels in the water-monitoring holes are directly related to <br />inclinometer deviations, and EDM point movements, then a drainage and <br />dewatering system should be installed here, Even though, from our work, it, <br />appears as if massive large-scale landsliding is not imminent, substantial <br />reduction in the possibility of it, combined with reduced maintenance of the <br />highway would undoubtedly justify the expense of installing the system, <br /> <br />- 13 - <br />