My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02526
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02526
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:19:41 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:25:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
5000.325
Description
Flood Protection Section - Minturn Task Force - Minturn-Redcliff-Eagle County-Plateau Creek Slides
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/16/1985
Title
Interim Report - Dowds Junction Landslides
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"j <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />003323 <br /> <br />Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) Report on the <br />Reconnaissance, Instrumentation, and Monitoring <br />of the Landslides in the Vicinity of Dowds Junction: <br />Interim Summary Report <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />James M. Soul e <br />Colorado Geological Survey, <br />. September 1985, <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />A cooperative effort between the CGH and CDOH has resulted in a <br />preliminary determination of lands1iding potential in the vicinity of Dowds <br />Junction. It appears that massive catastrophic 1ands1iding is not an <br />immediate threat for any of the four large landslide areas, but continued <br />activity of parts of these landslides can be expected to disrupt highway <br />service and cause maintenance problems, Large scale 1ands1iding has occurred <br />in the past, and is still possible, The most prudent course of action as long <br />as the current cycle of high soil moisture prevails is to continue monitoring <br />and observation of all of these landslides, This will entail some ongoing <br />costs and require continued coordination among the involved state and local <br />government agencies, <br /> <br />, The three instrumentation systems installed on the Meadow Mountain, Dowds <br />No, 1; and Whi skey Creek 1 ands1 i des in 1985 were not comp1 eted and moni tored <br />early enough in the season to make definitive recommendations based on 1985 <br />measurements, The real value of these systems will become apparent in 1986 <br />and subsequent years when observations can be made through the entire <br />high-risk season and technical difficulties with them are overcome, <br /> <br />The Meadow Mountain landslide should have surface water movement on and <br />across it minimized as soon as possible and this should be maintained unless <br />future study shows a lack of correlation between surface-water concentrations <br />and active hnds1 iding, Consi derati on shaul d be given to improvi ng the <br />highway detour around the landslide-damaged part of U,S. Highway 24 as it <br />probab1,r, wiJlbe-ne~ded:-in sUb,sequent--years,-- In future years' Jfrapi-d-l y' <br />increa..s,ed movement ofEDM points on the Meadow Mountain landslide or other <br />monitored slidesis'cietected, then field personnel should be dispatched to <br />determine if large-scale failure of any part of the landslide is imminent. <br />Close liaison among CGS, Highway, DODES and local officials should be <br />maintained in the reading, assessment, and distribution of monitoring data and <br />hazard interpretations. <br /> <br />- 1 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.