Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0";" (', <br />v~'vCO": <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />individual year annual flows and a 5 year moving average. The <br />data are reconstructed virgin flows for the period 1884-1983. <br />The reconstruction was done by accounting for man-caused <br />diversions into and out of the rivor system4 <br /> <br />FIGURE 4. <br />A report put out by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) <br />provided summary climate data for Colorado for the period 1888- <br />1982. Total annual precipitation was generally high from 1904- <br />1928, generally low 1929-1939, generally high in the early-mid <br />1940s, and thereafter more in the range of pre-1900 rainfall. <br /> <br />FIGURE 5. <br />The NCDC also summarized Colorado data on the Palmer Drought <br />Severity Index (PDSI) which integrates precipitation and <br />temperature data into a monthly moving average describing <br />moisture conditions. The period 1904-1930 had very high indices, <br />indicating very moist conditions, 1931-1937 had very low indices, <br />and 1953-1956 were also quite low. The other periods (1888-1903, <br />1938-1952, 1957-1982) tended to have more average PDSI values, <br />with some exceptions. <br /> <br />FIGURE 6. <br />Four rainfall stations along the eastern edge of the Rockies <br />between Colorado Springs and Fort Collins showed no clear <br />indication of the annual patterns described above. <br /> <br />FIGURE 7. <br />Annual rainfall data for Nebraska (1850-1984) also showed no <br />clear indication of the annual patterns described above. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />An apparent common thread between these data seems to be a <br />pattern of "average" flows for at least a few decades prior to <br />1900, high flows until 1930, then very low flows during the <br />19305, followed by a return to a more "average" range of flows <br />sometime in the 1940s, which has continued at least into the <br />early 1980s. The data I have discussed came from a variety of <br />sources and were presented in a variety of formats, so that some <br />degree of inconsistency between the results would be expected. <br /> <br />Also, as I understand the situation, all of the data that <br />show the pattern described above are largely influenced by <br />snowfall in the Rockies. This would explain the lack of the <br />pattern at the eastern Colorado and Nebraska rainfall stations. <br />Since annual flows in the Platte River system are driven largely <br />by snowmelt in the Rockies, these types of data should be <br />relevant to understanding the long term pattern of annual flows <br />in the Platte River, inclUding the magnitudes of annual flow that <br />would be moving through the river system today in the absence of <br />man's water management activities. <br />