Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Young-of-the- Year (YClY) and Juveniles <br />Larval razorback sucker sampling was not conducted in the San Juan River during the 7-year <br />research period. Some larval fishes were collected during nursery habitat studies, but no larval <br />razorback sucker were collected. However, larval razorback sucker sampling began in 1998 <br />because maturation of the stocked razorback sucker was expected, and two larvae were collected <br />by seining low-velocity habitats (S. Platania, University of New Mexico, Personal <br />Communication). In 1999, seven larvae were collected (S. Platania, University of New Mexico, <br />Personal Communication). These captures verified successful spawning of fish experimentally <br />stocked in the San Juan River. Future studies oflarval habitat use will be needed to determine what <br />habitats this life stage uses. <br /> <br />Juvenile habitat use determination also will have to wait until more juveniles are present in the <br />river. It is assumed that both larval and juvenile razorback sucker will select low-velocity habitats <br />and that these habitat; will likely be important for recovery of this species. <br /> <br />Other Native Fishes <br />Other native fishes of primary concern in the San Juan River during the 7-year research study were <br />roundtail chub, t1annelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, and speckled dace. Because of its reduced <br />numbers, roundtail chub is a concern in several parts of the Colorado River Basin, including the <br />San Juan River. It is state-listed as endangered in New Mexico (Propst 1999). Roundtail chub was <br />a target species for thf' SJRIP because it was rare in the San Juan River below Navajo Dam. The <br />other three species were generally common-to-abundant in most of the Upper Basin and in the San <br />Juan River (Table 3.1), although t1annelmouth sucker is rare in some portions of the Lower <br />Colorado River Basin. No radiotelemetry studies of these species were conducted, so specific adult <br />habitat use was not identified. <br /> <br />The SJRIP emphasis on the entire fish community, rather than just the endangered fish species, <br />, <br />provided considerable information on the more-common native fishes, such as t1annelmouth <br />sucker, bluehead sucker, and speckled dace. Although common throughout much of the Upper <br />Basin, information on these species was seldom provided in recovery effort reports. The adult <br />monitoring and secondary channel studies showed that bluehead sucker and speckled dace were <br />densest in the cobble substrate-dominated upper portions of the San Juan River. Their density <br />decreased in the middl.e river, and they nearly disappeared in the lower river. <br /> <br />Flannelmouth sucker, on the other hand, was not as tied to cobble substrates, and their density <br />continued at relatively high levels further downstream than either bluehead sucker or speckled dace <br />(Propst and Hobbes 2000, Ryden 2000a). The SJRIP studies showed that the habitat used by young <br />of these species varied through the summer and autumn. Flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, <br />and speckled dace young were found in nursery habitats during early summer, but their numbers <br />decreased in these low-velocity habitats in late summer and autumn. This change in habitat use <br />was noticed at other locations, but it was seldom documented to the extent that it was in the San <br />Juan River studies. Studies concerning abundance, general habitat use, and tributary habitat use <br />were also used to devdop the potential for limiting habitat for these species. <br /> <br />September 2000 <br /> <br />3-12 <br /> <br />Program Evaluation Report <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />