Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />00151)9 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 2: <br /> <br />RESEARCH AND RECOVERY <br />STUDIES ON THE SAN JUAN <br />RIVER <br /> <br />HISTORICAL STUDIES <br /> <br />No comprehensive studies of fish presence, abundance, distribution, or life history were conducted <br />on the San Juan River until the late 1980s. Earlier studies are generally only usable to determine <br />fish presence. The earliest accounts offish in this area were from a U.S. Army geographic and <br />geologic expedition to portions of the West during the early 1870s (Wheeler Survey): specimens <br />collected by the expedition were identified by ichthyologists at the National Museum in <br />Washington, D.C. (Cope and Yarrow 1875). Much of the early fish collections from the western <br />United States came from similar explorations, and it was common to have mistaken location <br />information for the specimens when they arrived at museums in the East. The first ichthyologist <br />to actually visit much of the West was David Starr Jordan, the father of modern ichthyology in the <br />United States, who was familiar with many of the fishes of the West from examining museum <br />specimens. Jordan visited the Durango, Colorado, area in 1889 and sampled some of the streams <br />there. As was his standard practice, he visited with local residents regarding fish they caught in the <br />rivers and streams, and these conversations provided valuable information on historic native fish <br />distribution and abundance (Jordan 1891). His collections from small streams verified the presence <br />of cutthroat trout (Onchorynchus clarki), speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), bluehead sucker <br />(Pantosteus discobolus), and mottled sculpin (Cottus baird/), native fishes of cooler streams. Local <br />residents told him about fish they caught for food, including tlannelmouth sucker (Catostomus <br />latipinnis), razorback sucker, and Colorado pikeminnow. Area residents indicated that Colorado <br />pikeminnow and razorback sucker ascended the Animas River, apparently to spawn in the spring. <br />These larger fish were generally well known by local residents of the Colorado River Basin because <br />they were important in their diets, along with native trout (Jordan 1891). Jordan's accounts of <br />razorback sucker and Colorado pikeminnow, although they are secondhand, are the first authentic <br />accounts of these species in the San Juan Drainage. Based on what is known about the distribution <br />and abundance of razorback sucker and Colorado pikeminnow today, the fact that these species <br />were known by local residents and were common enough to be caught in the Animas River, a cool <br />tributary, suggests they were likely common in the San Juan River. <br /> <br />Platania (1990) summarized museum specimens and collections in the San Juan Basin from 1900 <br />to 1960. Of the several collections made by state fish and game biologists, most were either from <br />the upper portion of the river near the present site of Navajo Reservoir, or from scattered <br />collections at access points such as Mexican Hat, Utah (Figure 2.1). Most of these specimens were <br />adults since collection teclmiques included angling and other methods targeting adult fish. Even <br /> <br />2-1 <br /> <br />Program Evaluation Report <br /> <br />September 2000 <br />