Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/03/98 TIlE 08: 36 FA..""( 303 231 5363 <br />000314 <br /> <br />SOLICITOR/DENVER <br /> <br />,> '(. <br />li~ <br />Q\\\ ./1. 1 <br />\\ ,/}/;J <br />V. ~p Y <br />\~' <br /> <br /> <br />i. Lujan v. Defende2:"1!I of Wildlife, 112 S. Ct. ' <br />2130 (1992), rev'g on Qthe~ grounds Defende~ <br />Q~ Wildlire v, Lu;an. 911 F.2d 117 (8th Cir. <br />1990) (holaillg" that; l:"egu1ation illegally <br />restricted scope of ,ElSA Section 7 to exclude <br />federal agency actions occurring in foreign <br />COU1'1t:r les) ;. <br /> <br />i~. Def@ndern of Wild]~fA v. ~a~h~~~, C~V. <br />No. 3-33 civil 607 (D. Minn. Sept. 1~, 1393), <br />dismissed as moot (Mar. 30 1934) (renewed <br />challenge to failure to consult over effects <br />of Three Gorges Dam in China) . <br /> <br />d. Responsihility for determining whether jeopardy <br />is likely to occur rests with the "action" agency. <br />See. e.g. Fy~pnd~ cf Payette v. HorReshoe Eend <br />Hvd~oelectric, 9aa F.2d 983 (9th Cir. 1993) <br />(Upholds Corps of Engineers determination that <br />project would not Significantly affect endangered <br />epecies) . <br /> <br />4. Other COllies; <br /> <br />a. T~@5see Valley A1]th~~i~y v. Hill, 437 U.S. <br />1.53 (1978). <br /> <br />~. RooBevel~ C~ohe11o Park Commission v~ E~Af <br />684 P.2d 1041 (1st Cir. 1982)_ <br /> <br />c. Villa~e of False Pass v. Watt, 565 F. Supp. <br />1123 (D. Alaska 1983), aff'd. 733 F.2d 605 (9th <br />Cir. 1984). <br /> <br />4. Pyrami~ Lake Paiute Tribe v. tt.S. Deosrtment qf <br />~, 896 F.2d 1410 (9th Cir. 1930). <br /> <br />e. Paeifie Rivers Council'~. Th~as, 30 F.3d 1050 <br />(9th Cir. 1994), aff'ina Pacific Rivers Council v. <br />Robert!'IOn, 854 F. Supp. 713 (D.Or. 1993) (Forest <br />Se~ice Land Resource Management plans are agency <br />actions requiring consultation), <br /> <br />- :'I - <br /> <br />I4J 010 <br /> <br /> <br />.......- <br />