Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11/03/98 TUE 08:34 FAX 303 231 5363 <br /> <br />SOLICITOR/DENVER <br /> <br />IlIJ 006 <br /> <br />000310 <br /> <br />razorback sucker had passed; order directing FWS to <br />make proposed designation within specified time). <br /> <br />S. Douglas County v. Lu1an, 48 F.3d 1495 (9th Cir. <br />1995), rev'<] 810 F.Supp. 1470 (D. Or. 1992) (FWS exempt <br />from NEPA in designating critical habitat for Northern <br />spotted owl) . <br /> <br />6. 'l':d.nit.y County ConcA>:n..d .citi:e:CA v. Lu,~;p, Civ. No. <br />n-U94, H93 WL 650393 (D.D.C. Sept. 20, 1993) (FWS <br />properly did not consider economic effects of listing <br />decision in designating critical habitat of Northern <br />spotted owl) . <br /> <br />7. Catr6n C~bntv Bn~rd of Commi~sion~rs. Naw Kexi~o v. <br />nlS., No. 94-2280, F..3d (10th Cir. 1996). FWS. not <br />- - . <br />exempt from NEPA in designating critical habitat fo~ <br />two listed fishes. <br /> <br />n. Whare To Pind Listed Species .~d Critical Xabit.t: <br /> <br />1. Endangered or Threatened Wildlife. 50 C.~.R. S <br />17.11, 17.95. <br /> <br />2. Endangered or Threatened Plants: 50 C.F.R. S ~7.12, <br />19.96. <br /> <br />E. Protective Regul.~ious (ESA Seotion 4{d)) <br /> <br />1. If a species is listed as threatened, secretary <br />shall issue regulations to provide for the conservation <br />of the species.. :ElSA II 4(d), l6 U.S.C. !i l533.Cd). <br /> <br />2. The Seeretary, through regulations, may extend <br />prohibitions against taking endangered species <br />contained in ESA!l Sea) (1), 16 a.s.c. Ii 1538(a) (1), to <br />threatened fish and wildlife. <br /> <br />3. 50 C.F.R. S 17.31: FWS regulation that <br />automatically a~lies all regulatory prohibitions <br />applicable to endangered ~pecies to threatened species <br />unless agency adopts a special rule to the contrary. <br /> <br />- 5 - <br />