My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02427
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02427
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:19:06 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062
Description
Federal Water Rights - Colorado Litigation - National Forest ISF Claims - Technical Sutdies
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
4/1/1986
Author
Unknown
Title
Technical Studies - Forest Service Manual - Title 2500 - Watershed Management
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001836 <br />2532.2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />TITLE 2500 - WATERSHED MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2532.2 - Analysis and Interpretation of Water Quality Data. <br />Analyze and interpret water quality inventory data to pre- <br />dict the effect of proposed land management practices on <br />present and future water quality. Use this information,. <br />along with watershed condition and other soil and water <br />resource data, to develop improved design of management <br />practices, provide a comparison of outputs under alterna- <br />tive management practices, and establish a basis for use in <br />defining water resource management objectives. The analysis <br />must be rigorous enough to make definitive statements con- <br />cerning anticipated water quality response. Apply a risk <br />analysis to selected alternatives similar to that discussed <br />in Chapter 10, FSH 2509.15. <br /> <br />2532.3 - Water Quality Standards. Each State is required <br />to review its water quality standards at least once every <br />3 years and revise them as necessary. Participate in <br />review of State standards and work toward change where <br />consideration is not given to the following factors: <br /> <br />1. Standards should reflect national as well as local <br />water quality objectives; be related to beneficial uses, <br />and recognize natural background and variability. <br /> <br />2. Compliance with approved best management practices <br />for control of nonpoint sources should constitute compliance <br />with water quality standards and these practices should be <br />based upon site-specific conditions and should include a <br />consideration of political, social, economic, and technical <br />feasibility. <br /> <br />3. Water quality standards that reflect nonpoint source <br />conditions should be used to measure effectiveness of best <br />management practices. <br /> <br />4. Consideration should be given to evaluating certain <br />water quality concerns, such as sediment, by observing a <br />surrogate such as channel condition. <br /> <br />s. Antidegradation policy should include a considera- <br />tion of both time and space and should not be based on <br />change at a single point. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />*-FSM 2/86 AMEND 47-* <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.