|
<br />."")','"" ,::f;,
<br />'.".,','..,..;>:;.:~,.,,' (':
<br />:\} E\ f\.1
<br />:,::::.;',<'{':"" ':.
<br />;} .r::!,,::.;";;,':?":!.:> .
<br />,:"~;,..'" >'/:......":",;.,,
<br />'",: ':; /,,/'}:.,,:',
<br />
<br />
<br />~::x,i'~'i)":';'~ ,,' ",:'''',;:-''.,,'
<br />'.;'" ,;;\',;",
<br />.:V;;',:;;:":.':;:"
<br />
<br />:"'\;''):f,.gij.~;~:',~c.~~;i
<br />I ,~i,);t'~?;'i:
<br />· q;';::~":}":">j(':~:;*"')"2."~:"":::<;,?;;:
<br />">;"" ""
<br />'!;<",,"{;.
<br />"':> '...
<br />
<br />;;:':',,:":::';iJ.s:::(" ic:':
<br />..".'.,/;'~,;?:;;:"';:
<br />,." "',<\,:;;:.:"
<br />:::'d"';,(:"";:,,,(,.} ;';
<br /><,;;>.',,}';{.': <:,,;:;,:J
<br />',,;r,
<br />"\, "';,',
<br />
<br />.; ;';',:i \
<br />.,.,,'?,<'i:.,;_:
<br />"
<br />.: {X';;:',':t::. ";,
<br />i:,;.;i',<,n;; 1:'.:';'
<br />",,;/\:.:\;,:.<~:, j;.::ttr:,,:)
<br />
<br />,.;.:':',',";''.:.'if.<
<br />
<br />/':\,}g;;:;:;.,;:';',,' '\
<br />',;'.. \","",'," '> y,
<br />? :::,.,',:,,:,";;.,':
<br />.,D..;'~:;t'(;:';'
<br />;.j:,.:;::;};'::
<br />:"'';':;';:'::''', "\:,,
<br />;:.;'{:\'::::} ',,",,
<br />,,%; ~';/";;::~;.,::y;,:<:)
<br />
<br />.,:-\::;t'r:;?~~/:.;: };i
<br />i:,,,,,_;,'>,:.:,',;,>;,,:
<br />;;):,::<:::::)",,;/,,',}";:',/:.
<br />.:~{ ';',': q:;;:/, ;;:'.f
<br />F' ,,::i~;,;;>,~:,/:.,'t::;:'
<br />, u, ;~~7,')';:;,'\\
<br />t",. ";.':? ""\ ::,;~
<br />.., ...;:/}.( -: "y;;:\:,:
<br />.5,:.'.;'/"',,; '/ ,.:' :'<. ";
<br />Y~'f:::';r;;.:?':i;::>;7
<br />::'::'::'(.:::,':":,.'.:i::;}:.",:~;(:,;
<br />
<br />24
<br />
<br />Consent Decree to the extent provided" after "procedures" and
<br />before "in Article IV" in line 14 on page 14.
<br />10. See, 10 (Indian Self-Determination Act), page 14, lines 16-
<br />25.-The previous noncfederal version of the first three lines oHhis
<br />provision is the same as the language of S. 1415, which reads:
<br />
<br />The design and construction functions of the Bureau of
<br />Reclamation with respect to the Dolores and Animas-La
<br />Plata Projects shall be subject . ,. '
<br />
<br />The federal parties objected to that language as overbroad and
<br />'instead suggested the following:
<br />
<br />The functions of the Bureau of Reclamation, under this
<br />Act with respect to each Tribe shall' be subject . . .
<br />
<br />The rest of the language ofthis section was previously agreed to
<br />by all parties; S. 1415 has created a new difference by deleting the
<br />phrase "under this Act" after the word "Tribes" in line 23 on page
<br />14.,
<br />11. There area few other differences of a more editorial nature
<br />which should also be noted.
<br />(a) Sees. 3(2) and 3(3) (project definitions),page 3.-At the end of
<br />the definition of the Dolores Project (Sec. 3(3), lines 21-23), the non-
<br />federal parties continue to include the language "and as further
<br />authorized by the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (98
<br />Stat. 2933; 43 U,S,C, 1591)." The federal parties wanted that lan-
<br />guage deleted because the purpose of this provision is simply to
<br />identify the project; it does not definitively state all the authorizing
<br />statutes.
<br />The language of S. 1415 also creates a new difference in previous-
<br />ly agreed upon language in this definition as well as in the defini-
<br />tion of the Animas-La Plata Project (Sec, 3(2)). It has deleted the
<br />phrase "as amended by" (on lines 14 and 20) between the two cites
<br />and has replaced it with "and" on line 14 and with a comma on
<br />line 20: '
<br />Note that our suggested compromise (that both definitions end
<br />after the cite to the CRSP Act on lines 13 and 20) has apparently
<br />been rejected by the non-federal parties.
<br />, (b) See, 5(bX2), page 5, lines 21-25, and page 6, lines 1-7.-S, 1415
<br />, creates a new difference in previously agreed upon language by
<br />adding "under this paragraph" after "required" in line 2 on page 6,
<br />(c) See, 6(bXlJ, page 7, lines 17-25, and page 8, lines 1-9.-S. 1415
<br />creates new differences in previously agreed upon language by de-
<br />leting "as provided in" after the Leavitt Act cite and before the
<br />. cite to section 4 of the CRSP Act (at the beginning of line 24 on
<br />page 7) and inserting "and" instead, S. 1415 also has added "com-
<br />monly referred to as the 'Colorado River Storage Project Act' " on
<br />line 25 on page 7 and line 1 on page 8, although that cite is to a
<br />single provision, not to the whole Act.
<br />(d) Sec. 11(b), page 15, lines 4-7,-S, 1415 creates another new dif-
<br />ference by removing the provision concerning the rights of individ-
<br />ual tribal members from section 4 (our 4(c), the non-federal parties'
<br />previous 4(b)) and placing it here in the Rule of Construction sec-
<br />tion, as 11(b). Presumably this was done in conjunction with the
<br />
|