My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02299
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:18:15 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:18:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8283.200
Description
Colorado River Basin-Colorado River Computer Models-Colorado River Decision Support System
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/7/1996
Author
Meg Frantz
Title
Yampa Enhancement-Memorandum-Miscellaneous Yampa Basin Model Issues Discussed Today
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10/07/96 <br /> <br />0008'35 <br />,) <br /> <br />13:42 <br /> <br />BOYLE ENGINEERING ~ 303 866 4474 <br /> <br />NO. 945 <br /> <br />[;102 <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Ray Bennett <br />Ray Alvarado <br /> <br />MegFrantz <br /> <br />October 7, 1996 <br /> <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />Miscellaneous Vampa 8asia model issues discussed today <br /> <br />This memo Sllmm"rizes conclusions reached at this morning's meeting among the three of us. Please let <br />me know if you have corrections. <br /> <br />Water rights on the Little Snake River along the ColoradolWyomtng border <br /> <br />· In'igated land lying close to the Slate Line and not modeled in Phase 2 will be aggregated together <br />into one aggregation rt;presenting approximately 4300 irrigated acres. Some lands in this category <br />are irrigated from Colorado rights and some are irrigated from Wyoming rights; most lands lie in <br />Colorado but small portions lie in Wyoming. Teasing apart the details for all lands,structures, and <br />rights is something the Division office is working on and that infonnation is not currently available <br />to us. By aggregating, at least the consumptive use will be represented in the model. There mayor <br />may not be adequate water rights in the Colorado tabs to 'adequately cover the demand; we will <br />address that once we get to running the model. In any event, we will identify improving the Little <br />Snake ponion of the model as a concern or desiIable future work. <br /> <br />Automation/reproducibility Issues <br /> <br />· Ability to reproduce model input files from the databases is of paramOWlt importance. That means <br />that all revisions should be clearly documented in the tiles themselves. <br /> <br />· To the extent possible, Boyle should probably try to automate changes made to the DMI-generated <br />tiles, for their own efficiency as well as for the sake of reproducibility. This is because we anticipate <br />that files will be created from the ground (Le., the DMI step) up many times over the course of doing <br />the model enhancements. Automation can be done adapting and using the A WK utilities that Rti <br />developed, or using utilities Boyle develops. Ray Bennett will see to it that all the processors used <br />by Rti are put out on caudo for Boyle's use. <br /> <br />· The Yampa input files probably were manually edited. In other words, there are probably no A WK <br />programs for them. <br /> <br />· For Task 3.01, it will be adequate to hand edit the .dds tile for the purpose of creating model input <br />that varies from Phase 2 model only with respect to treatment of instream flow rights. <br /> <br />Yampa basin aggregations <br />· Elk River should be grouped into three rather than two aggregations. <br /> <br />-.... .. - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.