My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02282
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02282
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:18:09 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:17:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin General Publications - Augmentation-Weather Modification
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1983
Author
Lynn A Sherretz
Title
Comparison of the Potential of Cloud Seeding to Enhance Mountain Snowpack in Colorado During Dry Normal and Wet Winters
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />003485 <br /> <br />Correlations for courses within most basins reveal a relationship <br />of moderate strength. A strong relationship was not expected considering <br />the many assumptions made and the probable errors associated with using a <br />single upwind sounding to represent conditions over the entire state. <br />These coefficients indicate that it is possible to obtain fair estimates <br />of actual snowfall from interpolated rawinsonde .data. <br /> <br />Identifying Seedable Events <br /> <br />Atmospheric scientists agree that not all winter clouds or storms <br />are seedable, but they do not agree on how to identify the ones that are <br />seedable. Identification is difficult because the microphysics of cloud <br />formation and growth is complex and because the important roles of <br />convection, orography and large-scale meteorological processes in the <br />developnent of storms are not understood adequately. As these topics are <br />beyond the scope of this study, we chose to identify seedable events by <br />using the results of statistical analyses of previous field experiments. <br />We chose the definitions presented and tested by Mielke et al. (1981) in <br />their re-analysis of the Climax experiments. <br /> <br />Mielke et al. found that precipitation during Climax I and II was <br />25 percent greater on seeded days than on control days when the <br />temperature at 500 rob was equal to or warmer than -20 degrees Centigrade. <br />The probability that this increase resulted trom chance alone was less <br />than .002. When storms with 500 rob temperatures colder than -20 degrees <br />Centigrade were seeded, increases in precipitation were not observed. <br />Mielke et a1. also observed maximum increases in precipitation when the <br />wind speed at 700 rob was between 12 and 14 meters/second. Increases were <br />not noted for lower or higher wind speeds. Based on these results, we <br />considered a storm seedable if its 500 mb temperature was warmer than or <br />equal to -20 degrees Centigrade and its 700 rob wind speed was between 9 <br />and 16 meters/second. The Mielke wind speed criteria were broadened <br />because not all basins in the state have similar topography (Grant, <br />personal communication). We assumed that these modified criteria are <br />valid statewide. The validity of this assumption is not known. <br /> <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.