Laserfiche WebLink
<br />003475 <br /> <br />It is easier to identify dry and wet winters when they are ranked by <br />percent of long-term water content. These rankings, from driest to <br />wettest for each sub-region and the combined mountain-wide area, appear in <br />Table 4. <br /> <br />TABLE 4 <br />Percent of long-term maximum spring sno~urse water content <br />ranked from lowest to highest for mountainous sub-regions of <br />Colorado.* <br /> Sub-Region <br />South North East Central West Central Combined <br />- <br />77 66 62 64 72 <br />79 71 69 76 n <br />82 79 76 91 83 <br />83 tl4 79 93 tl5 <br />84 85 81 93 87 <br />91 100 94 96 96 <br />92 104 98 98 103 <br />97 110 100 99 105 <br />118 118 102 100 110 <br />123 120 104 107 no <br />128 123 126 119 114 <br />136 124 134 127 127 <br />150 127 143 148 141 <br /> <br />*Winters are ranked independently for each sub-region. <br /> <br />The range and distribution of the percentages ranked in Table 4 vary <br />from one sub-region to another. Percentages generally range, however, <br />from a low of 60 to tlO percent to a high of 125 to 150 percent. None of <br />the winters appears to have been extremely dry or wet. For comparison, <br />similar percentages computed for the extremely dry winters of 1976-77 and <br />1980-81 appear in Table 5. Interpolated rawinsonde data are not available <br />for these winters, however. <br /> <br />16 <br />