My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02244
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:17:49 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:16:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.761.09.C
Description
Colorado River-Federal Agencies-US NPS-Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/1/1993
Author
BOR-NPS
Title
Legislation to Make BC a National Park-Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />F. Cumulative Impacts <br /> <br />Item 19. <br /> <br />Related Projects/Proposals - Address cumulative impacts on resources and <br />related projects when this action is considered with other proposed and existing <br />water projects and legislative designations. <br /> <br />Refer to: Gunnison meetings; the City of Colorado Springs; Mr. Clark; CREDA; CRWCD; <br />EPA; the NPCA; Non-Federal Parties to the 1975 Exchange Agreement. (49 comments) <br /> <br />Numerous respondents requested an analysis of how other proposed water projects would affect <br />various elements when considered in combination with the proposed water delivery contract. <br />Projects mentioned included AB Lateral, transbasin diversions, Rocky Point, Union Park, Dallas <br />Creek, Arapahoe County, City of Aurora, Redlands Diversion, Uncompahgre, Paonia, Smith <br />Fork, Bostwick Park, Fruitgrowers, and Dominguez. Elements discussed included water supply, <br />recreation releases, endangered fish, trout and native fisheries, and local, county, and basin <br />economies. <br /> <br />Concerns were also expressed on the effects of the contract on proposed legislation to designate <br />the Gunnison as a Wild and Scenic River, redesignate Black Canyon as a national park, and <br />establish a National Conservation Area in the Gunnison Gorge. <br /> <br />IV. UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS AND MITIGATION <br /> <br />During public meetings and included in several written comments were ideas and questions <br />concerning the potential mitigation problems that might occur under the contract. <br /> <br />Item 20. <br /> <br />Mitigation - Identify potential unavoidable impacts and need for mitigation. <br /> <br />Refer to: Gunnison, Montrose, and Delta meetings; Mr. Butterfield; CREDA; CRWCD; Mr. <br />Hinchman; Montrose Economic Development Council; Montrose County Commissioners. (17 <br />comments). <br /> <br />In Gunnison, it was asked how Morrow Point and Crystal Reservoirs could be operated to <br />mitigate effects of contract releases. Gunnison and Montrose meeting participants and the <br />Montrose Economic Development Council questioned if operational changes would cause <br />structural damage, increase operation and maintenance costs, or increase erosion problems at <br />Crystal Dam, Morrow Point Dam, the Gunnison Tunnel, or other downstream structures. If so, <br />they asked how these impacts would be mitigated and paid for. <br /> <br />One participant in Montrose asked whether Ridgway Reservoir of the Dallas Creek Project could <br />furnish water to downstream endangered fish species. Another participant suggested that better <br />water monitoring could result in more efficient water use. Several suggestions were made that <br /> <br />34, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.