Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~,. oooa03 <br />. <br /> <br />November I, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />· The file referred to as command.rib should be named command. net to make it consistent with <br />command file names in other basins. In general, the command files should be considered part of <br />the final deliverable model because they are essential to recreating files expeditiously. The final <br />command. * files should contain all instructions required to create the files. <br /> <br />Task 3.05 - Aggregate Water Right Classes <br /> <br />Meg submitted the draft memorandum for this task. <br /> <br />. Exhibit I differs from the preliminary Exhibit I discussed at the October 17 progress meeting. <br />The new graph reflects a correction in the way the list of Phase 3 water rights was handled in the <br />spreadsheet. <br /> <br />· It was noted that watright now assigns water rights to the correct class, and the bug identified in <br />that area was fixed quickly. However, watright still does not add structure names to the .ddr file <br />when setdiv command is used. Ray Alvarado thought he might have some recent e,mail related <br />to that subject. <br /> <br />Task 3.06 - Develop return flow data set <br /> <br />Meg submitted the draft memorandum for Task 3.06. Boyle needs to verify that watright supplies delay <br />table "I" to the .dds file by default, and that non.default delay tables are supplied to watright via the .rtn <br />file (this has been verified). . <br /> <br />Task 3.07 - Generate aggregated parameters <br /> <br />Meg submitted the draft memorandum for Task 3.07. <br /> <br />· There was a short discussion of the difference between acreage reported from the spatial database <br />and acreage reported from the relational database. The memo addresses them adequately. <br /> <br />· An editorial change was suggested to the explanation of the second watright run to force values <br />of acreage and ditch capacity. <br /> <br />Task 3.08 - Assign aggregated irrigation efficiencies <br /> <br />Meg submitted the draft memorandum for Task 3.08. There were no comments. <br /> <br />Regarding all of the above task memos, Ray Bennett suggested that we put "Yampa River" into the <br />subject line. <br /> <br />Minutes of October 17 Progress Meeting <br /> <br />Ray Bennett said that he was not comfortable with the language in the the second bullet paragraph under <br />Task 3.04. The sentence "Streamflow at the model's terminal node will not be indicative of historical or <br />predicted gage values," should rather emphasize what streamflow at the terminal node does represent. It <br />