My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02131
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02131
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:16:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:10:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.800
Description
Section D General Studies - Water Resources
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
11/1/1957
Author
USGS
Title
Water Resources Review - November 1957 through December 1958
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />UJJ758 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />JANUARY 1958 <br /> <br />There were no unusual events during January for the <br />United Stales and Canada as a whole. Locally there <br />was severe flooding in Texas, and minor flooding in <br />several other states. At two key stations in Maine, <br />at one in Massachusetts, and at one in British Colum- <br />bia, runoff was record high for January. These were <br />the most outstanding" events in a month when runoff was <br />above median in at least part of all Provinces and all <br />but about eight States. The only large area where <br />runoff was deficient was in the Southwest. Ground- <br />water levels generally rose along the Atlantic Coast <br />and in the South but declined in the Great Lakes area. <br />Elsewhere no significant areal trends were noticeable. <br /> <br />St'orage in most areas remained above average. John <br />Martin Reservoir in Colorado had the highest winter <br />carryover on record. <br /> <br />CANADA <br /> <br />The only deficient runoff in Canada was in British <br />Columbia where the only key station with record-high <br />runoff for January is also located. The excessive <br />runoff was largely the result of above normal <br />temperatures. <br /> <br />NEW ENGLAND <br /> <br />Record- or near~record high runoff for January <br />occurred at a number of key gaging stations as a result <br />of well above normal precipitatidn. There was minor <br />flooding in coastal areas of Massachusetts but peak <br />discharges were generally far below those of August <br />1955. In general, ground-water levels rose except <br />in Maine; they were average or above except in west- <br />ern Massachusetts where the level in the key well at <br />Great Barrington was record low for January. <br /> <br />NEW JERSEY <br /> <br />Reservoir storage increased and runoff was gener- <br />ally excessive with moderate flooding following the <br />storms of Jan. 15 and 22. An ice jam on Passaic <br />River caused serious damage in the borough of <br />Chatham. <br /> <br />THE SOUTHEAST <br /> <br />The effect of abnormally low temperatures in the <br />Southeast was most noticeable in Tennessee .where <br />base flows were reduced which, in combination with <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />below normal precipitation. produced deficient runoff. <br />Runoff was generally above median in the Atlantic <br />Coast States and minor floods occurred in North and <br />South Carolina. Ground-water levels general-ly rose <br />except in northern and central Florida and were well. <br />above average in many wells. <br /> <br />NORTHERN MIDCONTINENT STATES <br /> <br />The above normal temperatures in the Dakotas had <br />their effect on the water resources. Small streams <br />were flowing that normally are frozen, and snow cover <br />was light or negligible. The high January runoff there- <br />fore was at the expense of flows that would usually <br />come later in the season. Ground-water levels gener- <br />ally were about average in Nebraska but below average <br />in. Iowa. In North Dakota, the levels were below aver- <br />age in the southwestern part and above average else- <br />where. Both record-low and record-high levels for <br />January were observed in North Dakota. <br /> <br />TEXAS <br /> <br />Severe flooding in early January occurred in the <br />coastal area from Corpus Christi to Brownsville. and <br />runoff in the eastern half of Texas was excessive for <br />the fourth consecutive month. Contents of Medina Lake <br />near San Antonio was the largest for the end-of -month <br />since June 1941, and the level in an observation well <br />near San Antonio was the high~st observed since June <br />1950. The levels in most observation wells rose, but <br />in the well near EI Paso the level was record low for <br />January. <br /> <br />COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />Flow of Columbia River near The Dalles, Oreg., <br />was 102 percent of median after adjusting for storage <br />in seven major power reservoirs. <br /> <br />THE SOUTHWEST <br /> <br />Runoff was again deficient in southern California, <br />and it spread over almost all of Arizona. Snow cover <br />at end of January in Arizona was the lowest in 20 years <br />of record and in most areas soils were dry; the storm <br />of Feb. 3-5 provided some relief, however. Flow of <br />Colorado River near Grand Canyon, Ariz., was 120 <br />percent of median and excessive, and storage in Lakes <br />Mead and Mohave was well above average. Reservoir <br />storage in southern Arizona remained well below aver- <br />age. Ground-water levels remained at or near record- <br />low stages. <br /> <br />Prepared by W. S. Eisenlohr. E. W. Reed, and J. K. Searcy <br /> <br />INT.-!lUP.SEC....SlI..D.C.)0966 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.