Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~. <br /> <br />~ <br />000334 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />reformulating the five participating projects which have been <br />authorized for construction and three additional west slope <br /> <br />projects which are in various stages of study (Yellow Jacket on <br />the White River, Dominguez on the Gunnison River, and Grand <br /> <br />Mesa on the North Fork of the Gunnison River). The resulting <br /> <br />report, which was strictly a "quick and dirty" effort, was <br /> <br />published in August, 1980. <br />Of the eight projects, it was found that no significant <br /> <br />opportunity existed to add an energy component to a project, <br /> <br />or increase that already planned for, except in the case of <br /> <br />the West Divide and Savory-Pothook projects. This is because <br />three of the projects simply are not located in areas where <br /> <br />large, water consuming energy development will occur (San Miguel, <br /> <br />Fruitland Mesa, and Grand Mesa), while the other three have <br /> <br />~Aready been formulated to include every conceivable energy <br /> <br />demand (Animas-LaPlata, Dominguez, which is a hydropower peaking <br />unit, and Yellow Jacket). The B/C ratios of the former three <br /> <br />remain well below 1.0, while the ratios for the latter three <br /> <br />are 1.2, 1.0, and 1.2, respectively. <br />With respect to the West Divide and Savory-Pothook projects, <br />it was determined that each project could develop more <br /> <br />\~ater for <br /> <br />the energy industry, thereby increasing the B/C <br /> <br />ratio for each project to greater than 1.0. However, this was <br /> <br />accomplished for the Savory-Pothook project by assuming that <br /> <br /> <br />better than half of the project's originally planned for irriga- <br /> <br />tion water supply would be reallocated to energy. More im- <br /> <br />portantly, even though the overall BjC ratio for each project <br />exceeded 1.0, the separable irrigation components of both <br />projects failed the tests of economic feasibility <br /> <br />-4- <br />