My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC02080
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC02080
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:16:33 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 3:09:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.950
Description
Section D General Studies - General Water Studies
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
9/1/1981
Author
Colorado DNR
Title
Colorado Water Study - Background Volume - Preliminary Review Draft - Appendices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OJl097 <br /> <br />Draft - 9/81 <br /> <br />percent of Teller County are included for present population pur- <br />poses.) The role played by El Paso and Pueblo Counties is key to <br />the region's population picture. ~ccording to the 1979 estimate, <br />El Paso County alone contained more than half of the population <br />of the region (53.6 percent). Pueblo County, by itself, con- <br />tained 22.~ percent. Thus, these two counties together accounted <br />for more than three quarters of the region's population (76.0 <br />percent). The major cities of Colorado Springs and Pueblo are <br />responsible for the bulk of this populat ion. It is common know- <br />ledge that most of Colorado's inhabitants live along the Front <br />Range CorrIdor. ~s pointed out above, the large metropolitan <br />areas of Denver, Fort Collins, Greeley, Colorado Springs and <br />Pueblo provide most Front Range population. It is important to <br />recognize that, according to the 1979 estimates, the ~rkansas <br />Region and the Platte Region constitute 87.1 percent of Colo- <br />rado's population! <br />Contrasting with these two populous counties, the rest of <br />the region is inhabited by comparatively few peopie. By the 1979 <br />e~timates there are ten counties in the region with populations <br />of iess than 10,000. Many of these smaller counties may very <br />well lose population over the next ten to twenty years, or at <br />least experience comparatively slow growth rates. The low pro- <br />jections for 1990 for Custer, Cheyenne, Otero, Huerfano and Las <br />Animas Counties predict that the 1990 population will be less <br />than the estimated 1979 population, as does the same project ion <br />for Pueblo County. In several smaller counties, policy interven- <br /> <br />tions which were included to double base employment in the pro- <br /> <br />jections now seem highly unlikely. Specifically, a meat packing <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.