WSPC01926 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

001104 (CRBP). Among other things, the CRBP Act authorized the construction of the Animas-La Plata and Dolores Projects, concurrent with the completion of the Central Arizona Project. The authorization for the Animas-La Plata project was for a configuration substantially different than the presently proposed configuration. However, the Project was always contemplated to serve both Indian and non-Indian needs. Thus, as of the late 1960's, there was some resolution of Tribal claims, and a good deal of water development undertaken and contemplated in the San Juan River Basin. Some but not all of this development benefited the Tribes. However, quantification of Tribal claims, and their impact on non-Indians, were certainly open questions. The United States Supreme Court established a test for the amount of such claims, based on practicably irrigable acreage, which includes both present and future irrigation needs. Quantification of the Tribal claims in Colorado commenced in 1972, when the United States Department of Justice filed reserved rights claims on behalf of the two Ute Tribes in federal district court. The state of Colorado and other parties intervened, and moved to dismiss on the grounds that under the McCarren Amendment jurisdiction belonged in state water court. The United States Supreme Court ruled that state court was the most appropriate forum in which to achieve integrated adj udication of reserved rights claims. Immediately thereafter, the United States filed extensive claims in state water court. The Tribal claims encompassed the potential irrigation of some 93,000 acres, in over 25 stream systems tributary to the San Juan River. Most of these lands were in the La Plata and Mancos River Basins, which are water-short and over-appropriated. Success by the Tribes would totally eliminate existing non-Indian irrigation, disrupt local economies and create regional hostility. TIle 1986 Settlement Agreement and Subsequent Legislation In April 1985, negotiations to rights claims. based on several many parties, public and private, convened address the issues raised by the Tribe's reserved The state of Colorado's negotiating position was principles: . vested property rights held by owners of state decreed water rights would not be compromised; . existing economies should be protected; . existing uses should be protected by a "no injury" standard; . reserved rights claims should be quantified by state water court, not by Congress or in federal courts; and · the Tribes legitimate needs, such as the lack of a potable water supply for Towaoc, should be met.