My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC01611
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
14000-14999
>
WSPC01611
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:12:59 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:51:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064.100
Description
Ute Tribes
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
6/1/1987
Author
CO Dept of Law
Title
Agricultural Engineering Study - San Juan East Watershed - Final Report - Design-Cost Estimate for Off-Farm Irrigation Facilities and PIA Determination
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1408 <br /> <br />Off-farm irrigation transmission facilities <br /> <br /> <br />designed for- those parcels with preliminar-y <br /> <br /> <br />gr-eater than the off-farm water- pumping costs. <br /> <br /> <br />r-e-eval ua ted, added to the faci Ii ties cost. <br /> <br /> <br />preliminary payment capacity. <br /> <br />were conceptually <br /> <br />payment capacities <br />The pumping cost was <br />and compared to the <br /> <br />To complete the PIA analysis, the cropping patter-n and payment <br />capacities were reviewed by the economist taking into account the <br />practicality of the cropping pattern for the particular parcel and <br />any agr-onomic costs that might be par-ticular- to the parcel. Several <br />iterations of this pr-ocess between the economist and the engineer <br /> <br />were sometimes necessary in or-der- to develop the most economical <br /> <br /> <br />par-cel and facilities layout. Those parcels that still exhibited <br /> <br /> <br />positive residual payment capacity after- these further- analyses wer-e <br /> <br /> <br />then deter-mined to be pr-acticably irrigable. <br /> <br />D.2 SELECTION OF PARCELS FOR OFF-FARM DESIGN <br /> <br /> <br />Parcels to be considered for PIA analysis wer-e identified in the Task <br /> <br /> <br />B Report along with on-farm irrigation costs. The Task B report <br /> <br /> <br />identified irrigation costs for handmove spr-inkler, sideroll <br /> <br /> <br />sprinkler, gravity (furrow or basin). center pivot, and center pivot <br /> <br /> <br />with sprinkler in the cor-ner-s. Computer- tabulation compar-ed on- <br /> <br /> <br />farm ir-rigation costs to the crop payment capacity for- an <br /> <br /> <br />alfalfa/barley crop rotation. <br /> <br />The fir-st step in making this task analysis was detet:mination of the <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.