WSPC01522

• File Number: 8283.200
• Description: Colorado River Basin-Colorado River Computer Models-Colorado River Decision Support System
• State: CO
• Basin: Colorado Mainstem
• Water Division: 5
• Date: 4/1/1996
• Title: Boyle Contracts-Original-White River Basin Enhancement-Draft
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Operating Principles/Plan

:F1PR-311H996 12:30 FROM RIVERSIDE TECHNOLOGY,INC

I
I

I.
I
I
2,11. I Modify instream flow f les to represent upstream and downstream terminus

Objechve: For the White ver Basin, modify ST A TEMOD input files to represent instream
flows 4sing only an upstream d downstream terminus. This task is to be accomplished through
the following specific work tas

I
APprth:

11.
I
I
12.
I
13.

I

/-f\ ",b !
1
14.
I
I
(
16.

"

Delivl7rables:
I
I-

OO~4
I

TO

13038664474555 P.10

II. State: Docume t the determination of aggregated reservoir/stock pond nodes,
their associated ecrec weighted administration numbers, their location in the
Phase III netwo k, their physical capacities. end-of-month content, and monthly
targets in a 4-6 age memorandum for review.
12. RTiWR: Revie memorandum.
13. State: Incorpor te consultant comments.

.

State: Cumulative. tock pond capacity in acre-feet supplied to the consultant in a 1
page memorandum.
State: A memoran um documenting the aggregated reservoirs/stock ponds and their
associated characte 'stics (location, area.capacity, evaporation, decree weighted
administration num er, target, and end-of-month content).
RTiWR: ST A TEM D input files reflecting aggregated reservoir and stock ponds.

\t

7.
8.

State: Modify
terminus of ins
instream flow
RTiWR: Rege
Basin to represe
terminus.
RTiWR: Simul e basin using both the new instrearn reach approach and the
Phase n appro h and prepare a single big picture plot (annual average diversion
comparison) tor each of the two runs. Only the big picture plots will be supplied
to the State, if I rge differences are noticed, the State will be responsible for
requesting addil anal runs (requiring a change order) and mliking changes to
ST ATEMOD. Y additional comparisons will require a change order.
State: ReVicw~e Phase ill model network and determine any additional CWCB
instream flow r' aches to be modeled within Phase ill.
RTiWR: Modi the Phase III ST A TEMOD input files to incorporate new
instream flow aches.
State: Document the modification of ST A TEMOD input files to represent
upstream and d wnStream terminus and the comparison of the Phase III and Phase
11 runs in a 1-2 age memorandum.
RTiWR: Revie memorandum.
State: Incorpor te consultant comments.

T A TEMOD program to consider upstream and dowllstrearn
earn flows to avoid the current necessity of duplicating the game
low each structure in Ihe reach.
rate the Phase II STATEMOD input ftles for the White River
t minimum flow reaches using only an upstream and downstream