Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, .. ....,., .. . ' <br />I ..."." Af'R-24-1996' 15:58 ' FIU1 'RIVERSIDE lEom...oov.INC <br /> <br />RTiWR: Regenerate the Phase IT STATEMOD input files for the White River <br />Basin to represent minimum flow reaches using only an upstream and downstream I <br />terminus. r' \o,-I.~~L C. -. """'d <br />RTiWR: Simulate basin using new instream reach appro~ and compare results <br />with the Phase n $imlllAtion. Use only the big-picture plotting to compare runs. If v1-P <br />large diffctenccs are noticed. the State will be responsible for changes ~ort:k ~ II &..,. <br />ST^'TEMOD /':\ "- lfc;X\ K t...rtl{ '!t'i({jt f1 <br />n . '--' "e. c:~""..- "~" ~;;~ ~ ,oJ ' " [, , <br />R'tiWR: Doeument the modification of STATEMOD input files to represent ""l'~i k"J) <br />upstream and downstream terminus and the compari~on of the Phase m and Phase c~l~-.J- <br />IT runs in a 1-2 page memo for State review. ~,k.J) <br />5. 1"'Jt\~: TncOlpOI'IIte State comments. v-",':3 <br /> <br />liv I l~' ~\: \.- ~~ _. lle0L~ <br /> <br />1 <br />6 ,2. <br />Vi <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />!3.. <br /> <br />I-'f <br /> <br />4. <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />. A memorandum documenting the modification of ST ATEMOD input flIes to <br />represent upstream and downsueam terminus and the comparison of the Phase m and <br />Phac;e n runs. <br />. ST A TEMOD input meB reflecting instream reaches modeled using upstream and <br />,~:-t' , <br />I)" downstream terminus. " (l..' Jr 1 , 'Cl' .~ () td\ I \ r rl _ <br />I @'" \"~ "~ r ~~ if"<--"'''->l s~~- ,0. <br />I ,'0 - _ <br />.12'1 Base flow generdtion 6..~ L<<lol.i~I'>- V""-\s--C~'--~l..~ -t- <br /> <br />Objective: For the White River Basin, generate the ba~e flow hydrology after the inclu.~ion of <br />aggre~ated irrigation structures, reservoirl)/stock ponds, and illSlream flows. 11 is assumed for <br />budgeting purposes that most of lIle aggregated structures will be imJlO5ed on the existing base <br />flow detWork. However, it is estimated that the number of base flow points may increase but will <br />not exj;eed 5 additional baseflow poinlS. This task is to be accomplished through the following <br />specific work tasks: <br />! /' <br /> <br />Appdach: ,oJ ~ ~ <br />lIJ'c I :e6-~ <br />11" 11. RTiWR: Determine ibutary area, average a.:eal precipitation, and the precipitation <br />I weighted area for new base flow poinl1 These area.~ will be double planimetered <br />i by hand rather than using GIS delineation. <br />~b,1 2. RTiWR: For each new base flow polntbcing added to the network, check to see ifa <br />I significant stream flow gage (5 years within study period) exists within the tributary <br />I and add the gage to the network. This includes filling missing data at the gage <br />j location if required. <br />'\ ' ! 3. RTiWR" Revise the requiTed STATEMOD jnput flles to include the new base flow <br /> <br />'151 points. ' , '\~3 <br />, 4~~: Generate base flows and visually <:heck for negative base flow values. 'V \ w- ~ ~~ <br />% ! 5.' . : Document the base flow network, any additional ~treamf1ow gages and ' <br />! associated data filling, and !he base flows in a 1-2 page memo for State review. ~ <br />~ i 6. RTiWR: 11'lcol:J1C1,&!e SI. semlJ\c..l1. <br />, 1,\",-,\<:"...., -'-\ \.-....-' L_,,\ <br />'" L<>>\II"-'- <br /> <br />~ 'i'eu\ '-'-"-' (l,..JC-tb ~ <br /> <br />~~'<"- f-l'lu's C) l\~ rD~\~ <br /> <br /><~'C~~ ,Wew-ok ~\e ~ <br /> <br />'i <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />1:JW866~ P.10 <br /> <br />'S, L - <br /> <br />5~ <br />&o~J.J <br />'I\."l\.. ~Q <br /> <br />5LO~) <br /> <br />5.1- <br />