Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i"'i. <br />If <br />j I <br /> <br />.......................:"'.......,--~, . <br /> <br />. .'.~..,.~ ~~..... ."... .....,...,."...~,.~...-..,..,~,.... ........~~..-.. . .. <br /> <br />... ._...... .~,.I, .""'..."._____~...........-_'_.CI........ <br /> <br />0;)0737 <br /> <br />i <br />: ' <br />i <br />I, <br />i <br />1, <br /> <br />insensitive to soil water deficits, This form of information management is generally referred to as deficit <br />irrigation, and results in decreases in beneficial consumptive use, Various state and federal agencies have <br />devoted significant research effort in recent years to defining deficit irrigation practices that will allow <br />producers to either avoid or minimi7C economic and productivity losses, Substantial progress has been made <br />in devising successful strategies, especially with grain crops, in which the fraction of the plant harvested for <br />sale or direct end-use is only a fraction of biological yield, <br />Changes in cropping patterns also can result in decreases in beneficial consumptive water use, Examples <br />of specific changes include reducing acreages of irrigated crops, switching entirely to dryland crops, and <br />switching to crops with lower seasonal consumptive use, <br />Some conservation measures can be implemented at the system level to improve overall application <br />efficiency within a basin and, in some cases, decrease nonbeneficial consumptive use, For example, some <br />segments of conveyance canals maintained by irrigation companies in the Grand Valley have been lined to <br />reduce seepage losses and decrease nonbeneficial consumptive water use by weedy plant communities along <br />these canals. Further savings have been proposed for other delivel)' systems in the Grand Valley by the use <br />of structural alterations in canals that will result in increased application efficiencies, <br /> <br />I <br />; <br />i' <br />! : <br /> <br />" <br />i <br />i <br /> <br />it <br />Ii <br />II <br /> <br />Incentives for adoDtine: water conservation measmes, Incentives for adopting water conservation practices <br />vmy regionally, In those areas pumping from deep ground waler aquifers, economic incentives for water <br />conservation exist because practices that result in increased application efficiency can frequently be justified <br />on the basis of decreased pumping costs, In addition, institutional incentives in the form of restrictions on the <br />rate of aquifer depletion encourage the adoption of irrigation water conservation practices, <br />In the alluvial watershed basins where water is obtained from surface diversions or shallow aquifers, <br />incentives for adopting practices that decrease consumptive use or result in saved water are somewhat limited <br />unless the water conserved can be used to extend supplies under the tenns of an existing water-right decree. <br />In some situations other direct economic benefits can be reaIized from the adoption of water conservation <br />measures, Examples include savings from reduced power costs associated with pumping and revenue derived <br />from marketing the conserved water on the rental or sales market Economic benefits are difficult to project <br />on general basis because the large number of variables involved requires that potential gains have to <br />evaluated on a case-by-case basis. <br />If the goal is to recover salvaged water for some other beneficial use, incentives for conservation are <br />generally assumed to be limited because of the amounts of water available from changes in practices or <br />potential institutional, statutory, and economic barriers to transfer of use, In the case of water conserved by <br /> <br />44 <br />