My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC01387
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC01387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 7:56:27 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:45:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8045
Description
Section D General Studies-Federal Projects-General
Date
1/1/3000
Title
Moon Lake Power Plant Project-Corres 1977-81-Comments of the Rio Blanco Board of County Commissioners on Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Moon Lake Power Plant Project-Units 1 and 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I~ <br /> <br />~ -.. -. ... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />....... <br /> <br />'--' <br /> <br />- 28 - <br /> <br />\, <br /> <br />in 1983 or 1984 is expected from these <br />lands about seven miles northeast of <br />Rangely, Colorado. The coal will be <br />burned in a new power plant planned to <br />be built near Bonanza, Utah." Id. at 18 <br />(emphasis supplied). <br /> <br />3. Deseret has indicated that it plans to begin <br /> <br />'-' <br /> <br />construction at the Bonanza site in May 1981. It has <br /> <br />therefore acted as if it is certain that the final EIS. <br /> <br />will recommend and the decisionmaker will determine to <br /> <br />locate the power plant at the Bonanza site. <br /> <br />4. Deseret has applied for and apparently received <br /> <br />from Region VIII of the Environmental Protection Agency a <br /> <br />PSD permit for the power plant at the Bonanza site. Once <br /> <br />again, this action is designed to foreclose options of the <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />decisionmakers and belies the statement in the draft EIS <br /> <br />that further reviews would be undertaken before issuance <br /> <br />of a PSD permit. <br /> <br />5. Air quality monitoring was performed only at <br /> <br />sites in Utah (DEIS at 160-163), and visibility modeling <br /> <br />was undertaken only at the Bonanza site (DEIS at 248). <br /> <br />Aside from the fact that this action makes impossible any <br /> <br />meaningful comparison of air quality effects at the two <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />0387 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.