My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC01380
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC01380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:45:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin General Publications - Augmentation-Weather Modification
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/18/1986
Author
WBLA Inc
Title
Uses of Increased Flows Originating on the Arapaho National Forest - Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />003144 <br /> <br />Page 43 <br /> <br />2. Effects of increased water demands given current institutions <br /> <br />The initial conclusion that flow augmentation produces little change in <br /> <br />beneficial water use under current demand conditions immediately raised the <br /> <br />question of how that conclusion might change if proposed development projects <br /> <br />were to be built, thereby increasing the physical capability to satisfy <br /> <br />additional water demands. Water demands projected for the full development <br /> <br />scenarios were about 30 percent above those of the current scenario. As shown <br /> <br />in Table IV-2, the conclusion is not greatly changed under the full development <br /> <br />scenario. <br /> <br />Average annual Upper Basin shortages were only about 18,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />annually under the full development scenario and were unaffected by increased <br /> <br />flows. These shortages are "local" ones, which is to say that they occur at <br /> <br />high elevations where they cannot be alleviated by the operation of existing or <br /> <br />planned storage and diversion facilities. They are not limitations imposed by <br /> <br />the water allocations assigned to the Upper Division states under the Colorado <br /> <br />River Compacts, because under the simulated conditions, there were no shortages <br /> <br />in the Lee Ferry delivery, so no curtailment of Upper Basin uses was necessary. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Lower Division shortages in the full development scenario are substantial. <br /> <br />Under baseline runoff conditions they amount to an average of 644,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />annually (nearly eight percent of total Lower Division Colorado River water <br /> <br />demand). Nearly ninety percent of the shortages are reductions in deliveries to <br /> <br />the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, nearly half of total <br /> <br />Colorado River water demand by the district, Which currently uses more than its <br /> <br />allotted share because neither CAP nor the Upper Basin are yet able to use their <br /> <br />full allocations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.