My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC01380
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
13000-13999
>
WSPC01380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 2:45:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin General Publications - Augmentation-Weather Modification
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/18/1986
Author
WBLA Inc
Title
Uses of Increased Flows Originating on the Arapaho National Forest - Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />003113 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />River Basin Act, the Congress instructed the Secretary of the Interior to <br /> <br />develop and adopt criteria for the operation of the series of federal reservoirs <br /> <br />which had been constructed to manage the river's flow. The statutory guidelines <br /> <br />provide that the operating rules for Glen Canyon and Hoover Dams, in particular, <br /> <br />will assure compliance with the Mexican Treaty, deliver the required 75 million <br /> <br />acre-feet per decade to the Lower Basin states, provide carry-over storage to <br /> <br />accomplish the first two objectives, and maintain parity in the active storage <br /> <br />between Lakes Powell and Mead. The 1968 Act also added another significant <br /> <br />operational constraint by making Arizona mainstem diversions under Central <br /> <br />Arizona Project (CAP) junior to the first 4.4 MAF of California mainstem <br />allocations, as well as to Nevada's and Arizona's non-CAP allocations. This <br /> <br />concession cancelled out part of Arizona's victory in Arizona v. California, but <br /> <br />was necessary to obtain California's SUPPOTt for Congressional authorization and <br /> <br />funding of the multi-billion dollar CAP. <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.