<br />
<br />S~
<br />
<br />. E~ ARLY IN APRIL, the state and federal governments
<br />announced that they had come to an agreement
<br />cQnceming river flows through the Black Canyon of the
<br />Gunnison National Park. The feds would settle for less
<br />than they might have been able to claim under state
<br />law, That could mean that water in the upper GunnisQn
<br />basin has become available fQr diversion to the Eastern
<br />Slope and Front Range. o~ it <:ou!d me:ln nothing of the
<br />son.
<br />What it does mean is that a big water battle is likely
<br />to start heating up almost any day now. Gunnison
<br />County has a "not one drop" policy concerning water
<br />exports, while Fronr Range interests will argue thatwa-
<br />ter in the Gunnison Basin should serve the entire state,
<br />not just the Western Slope.
<br />As with all matters of Colorado water, it's a compli-
<br />cated issue. But we can start with a few facts, One is
<br />that Colorado is, on average, a desert. Although some
<br />spots are obviously wetter than others, our state overall
<br />averages only 17 inches of precipiration a year, and
<br />regular agriculture requires at least 20,
<br />The Continenral Divide winds through the moun-
<br />tains of Colorado. In general, water that lands on the
<br />Eastern Slope flows to the Atlantic Ocean, via the
<br />Platte, Arkansas, Rio Grande, and their tributaries, Wa-
<br />ter on the Western Slope flows into the Pacific Ocean,
<br />via the Colorado River and its many tributaries - the
<br />Gunnison is the largest tributary in CQIQradQ.
<br />On the Eastern Slope, most of the population lives in
<br />a belt a few miles east of the Front Range, This strip ex-
<br />tends along Interstate 25 from Fort Collins to PueblQ,
<br />and it has about 80% of Colorado's population. But it
<br />has natural access to only 20% of Colorado's water sup-
<br />ply.
<br />By contrast, the Western Slope has only 10% of the
<br />state's populatiQn, and about BO% of the state's water,
<br />Colorado could have tried moving the people to the
<br />water, perhaps, but what evolved during the 20th cen-
<br />tury, as the Front Range population grew~ w3;s m~ving
<br />the water to the people with transmountam dIVersIOns.
<br />Collection and stQrage systems were built on the West-
<br />ern Slope; the water was conveyed through a tunnel to
<br />the Eastern Slope, where it was distributed to farms
<br />and cities.
<br />There was a logic tQ this, The South Platte valley has
<br />some of the most productive agriculture in the United
<br />Srates, and providing more water meant that ColQ~ado
<br />was better able tQ feed itself. The relauvely
<br />unpopulated Western Slope didn't really have a "bene-
<br />ficial use" for much of the water that fell on it, and SQ
<br />why not move the water to where it would do Colorado
<br />the most gQod?
<br />So there was the ColoradQ-Big Thompson Project of
<br />1937, taking about 300,000 acre-feet a year from the
<br />Colorado River near its headwaters at Grand Lake, and
<br />transporting it through the 12,B-mile Alva Adams tun-
<br />nel under Rocky Mountain NatiQnal Park to serve
<br />irrigators and cities along the South Platte, clear to the
<br />Nebraska line,
<br />The next drainage to the south, one that sits almQst
<br />
<br />18' Colorado Central Magazine. June 2003
<br />
<br />A LETTER FROM THE EDITORS
<br />
<br />Why the
<br />Water BuRaloes
<br />of Colorado
<br />are Starting. to Circle
<br />around the Gunnison
<br />
<br />due west of Denver where the Continenral Divide is a
<br />narrow ridge, is the Fraser River. Denver tapped it with
<br />the Moffat Tunnel pioneer bore in 1937. Next comes ,
<br />the Williams Fork, also tapped by Denver. Then the
<br />Blue River, which was tapped by Denver with Dillon
<br />ReservQir and the Roberts Tunnel in 1962.
<br />And then, well, we run out of convenient place~ to
<br />tap. The Continental Divide swings. west, m.ean~ng
<br />greater transport distances, The east SIde of theDlVl.de
<br />is no longer South Plarte drainage, but Arkansas dram-
<br />age. The Arkansas valley in Colorado is poorer and less
<br />PQPulated, and thus less able to pay for water projects
<br />than the SQuth Platte valley.
<br />So there are only two major diversions from the
<br />Western Slope into the Arkansas: the Boustead 'funnel,
<br />part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project (about 70,000
<br />acre-feet a year), and the Twin Lakes 'funnel, a private
<br />development (about 30,000 acre-feet a year),
<br />Both of tl1Qse get their water from tributaries of the
<br />main stem of the Colorado River in Colorado (which
<br />wa's known as the Grand until 1922, and these discus-
<br />sions WQuld be simpler if it were still the Grand). That
<br />stem is pretty well tapped out now.
<br />
<br />ON THE WET WESTERN SLOPE, the next basin to
<br />the south is the Gunnison. Given what else has
<br />happened, the question that comes to mind is "Why
<br />hasn't it been tapped before by the Eastern Slope?"
<br />For one thing, it sits about 150 miles from the state's
<br />population centers. Water that got across the Divide
<br />would not arrive on the South Platte that has most of
<br />the state's population, but Qn the Arkansas, and getting
<br />it to the Platte would mean conveying it across yet an-
<br />other mountain range.
<br />Just getting it to the Arkansas would be expensive,
<br />on account of the economics of tunnels. You want the
<br />tunnel's elevation as low as possible, so that you use
<br />cheap gravity (as QPPQsed to expensive pumps) to col-
<br />lect a lot of water above the tunnel intake. But the
<br />lower the tunnel, the longer it is, especially when the
<br />mountain range in question is the immense Sawatch
<br />Range, rather than the relatively narrow hog-back sec-
<br />tion of the Front Range where the Moffat Thnnel was
<br />bQred.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />001779 ;
<br />
<br />
|