Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />S~ <br /> <br />. E~ ARLY IN APRIL, the state and federal governments <br />announced that they had come to an agreement <br />cQnceming river flows through the Black Canyon of the <br />Gunnison National Park. The feds would settle for less <br />than they might have been able to claim under state <br />law, That could mean that water in the upper GunnisQn <br />basin has become available fQr diversion to the Eastern <br />Slope and Front Range. o~ it <:ou!d me:ln nothing of the <br />son. <br />What it does mean is that a big water battle is likely <br />to start heating up almost any day now. Gunnison <br />County has a "not one drop" policy concerning water <br />exports, while Fronr Range interests will argue thatwa- <br />ter in the Gunnison Basin should serve the entire state, <br />not just the Western Slope. <br />As with all matters of Colorado water, it's a compli- <br />cated issue. But we can start with a few facts, One is <br />that Colorado is, on average, a desert. Although some <br />spots are obviously wetter than others, our state overall <br />averages only 17 inches of precipiration a year, and <br />regular agriculture requires at least 20, <br />The Continenral Divide winds through the moun- <br />tains of Colorado. In general, water that lands on the <br />Eastern Slope flows to the Atlantic Ocean, via the <br />Platte, Arkansas, Rio Grande, and their tributaries, Wa- <br />ter on the Western Slope flows into the Pacific Ocean, <br />via the Colorado River and its many tributaries - the <br />Gunnison is the largest tributary in CQIQradQ. <br />On the Eastern Slope, most of the population lives in <br />a belt a few miles east of the Front Range, This strip ex- <br />tends along Interstate 25 from Fort Collins to PueblQ, <br />and it has about 80% of Colorado's population. But it <br />has natural access to only 20% of Colorado's water sup- <br />ply. <br />By contrast, the Western Slope has only 10% of the <br />state's populatiQn, and about BO% of the state's water, <br />Colorado could have tried moving the people to the <br />water, perhaps, but what evolved during the 20th cen- <br />tury, as the Front Range population grew~ w3;s m~ving <br />the water to the people with transmountam dIVersIOns. <br />Collection and stQrage systems were built on the West- <br />ern Slope; the water was conveyed through a tunnel to <br />the Eastern Slope, where it was distributed to farms <br />and cities. <br />There was a logic tQ this, The South Platte valley has <br />some of the most productive agriculture in the United <br />Srates, and providing more water meant that ColQ~ado <br />was better able tQ feed itself. The relauvely <br />unpopulated Western Slope didn't really have a "bene- <br />ficial use" for much of the water that fell on it, and SQ <br />why not move the water to where it would do Colorado <br />the most gQod? <br />So there was the ColoradQ-Big Thompson Project of <br />1937, taking about 300,000 acre-feet a year from the <br />Colorado River near its headwaters at Grand Lake, and <br />transporting it through the 12,B-mile Alva Adams tun- <br />nel under Rocky Mountain NatiQnal Park to serve <br />irrigators and cities along the South Platte, clear to the <br />Nebraska line, <br />The next drainage to the south, one that sits almQst <br /> <br />18' Colorado Central Magazine. June 2003 <br /> <br />A LETTER FROM THE EDITORS <br /> <br />Why the <br />Water BuRaloes <br />of Colorado <br />are Starting. to Circle <br />around the Gunnison <br /> <br />due west of Denver where the Continenral Divide is a <br />narrow ridge, is the Fraser River. Denver tapped it with <br />the Moffat Tunnel pioneer bore in 1937. Next comes , <br />the Williams Fork, also tapped by Denver. Then the <br />Blue River, which was tapped by Denver with Dillon <br />ReservQir and the Roberts Tunnel in 1962. <br />And then, well, we run out of convenient place~ to <br />tap. The Continental Divide swings. west, m.ean~ng <br />greater transport distances, The east SIde of theDlVl.de <br />is no longer South Plarte drainage, but Arkansas dram- <br />age. The Arkansas valley in Colorado is poorer and less <br />PQPulated, and thus less able to pay for water projects <br />than the SQuth Platte valley. <br />So there are only two major diversions from the <br />Western Slope into the Arkansas: the Boustead 'funnel, <br />part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project (about 70,000 <br />acre-feet a year), and the Twin Lakes 'funnel, a private <br />development (about 30,000 acre-feet a year), <br />Both of tl1Qse get their water from tributaries of the <br />main stem of the Colorado River in Colorado (which <br />wa's known as the Grand until 1922, and these discus- <br />sions WQuld be simpler if it were still the Grand). That <br />stem is pretty well tapped out now. <br /> <br />ON THE WET WESTERN SLOPE, the next basin to <br />the south is the Gunnison. Given what else has <br />happened, the question that comes to mind is "Why <br />hasn't it been tapped before by the Eastern Slope?" <br />For one thing, it sits about 150 miles from the state's <br />population centers. Water that got across the Divide <br />would not arrive on the South Platte that has most of <br />the state's population, but Qn the Arkansas, and getting <br />it to the Platte would mean conveying it across yet an- <br />other mountain range. <br />Just getting it to the Arkansas would be expensive, <br />on account of the economics of tunnels. You want the <br />tunnel's elevation as low as possible, so that you use <br />cheap gravity (as QPPQsed to expensive pumps) to col- <br />lect a lot of water above the tunnel intake. But the <br />lower the tunnel, the longer it is, especially when the <br />mountain range in question is the immense Sawatch <br />Range, rather than the relatively narrow hog-back sec- <br />tion of the Front Range where the Moffat Thnnel was <br />bQred. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />001779 ; <br /> <br />