Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1336 <br /> <br />FINAL REPORT <br />ANIMAS AND FLORIDA WATERSHEDS <br /> <br />D.1 GENERAL <br />The purpose of this task report is to present the methodology for <br />determining practicably irrigable acreage (PIA) for the Animas and <br />Florida River Watersheds. The test for PIA requires that the <br />revenues exceed the cost. The land under consideration when cropped <br /> <br /> <br />and irrigated must return sufficient net positive income to pay for <br /> <br /> <br />the costs of providing irrigation water to the farm headgate. In <br /> <br /> <br />order to determine PIA it is necessary to conceptually design an <br /> <br /> <br />irrigation transmission system to deliver water to the farm headgate <br /> <br /> <br />for each arable parcel. The annualized cost of the off-farm <br /> <br /> <br />irrigation water transmission system is compared to the net positive <br /> <br /> <br />income (payment capacity) of the parcel. <br /> <br />Arable lands were identified by Stoneman and Landers. Potential <br />crops, irrigation water requirements, on-farm irrigation systems <br /> <br />cost, and other related agronomic information were prepared by Boyle <br /> <br />and presented in Task A and B reports. Economic methodology and net <br />agricultural returns were prepared by Western Research Corporation. <br /> <br />This preliminary PIA analysis compares the preliminary net <br /> <br /> <br />agricultural return with the cost of water delivery from the primary <br /> <br /> <br />water source to the parcel headgate. For this preliminary analysis, <br /> <br /> <br />the highest net agricultural return for each climatic zone is used. <br /> <br />1 <br />