|
<br />ClW2 OJ
<br />
<br />so
<br />
<br />TABLE 5.-SUMMARY or ANNUAL QUANTITIES OF GROUND AND SURFACE WATER AVAILABLE FOR SALVAGE
<br />WITHIN SALVAGE AREA
<br />
<br /> IUnit-I,OOl)acre.full
<br /> ~- -
<br /> Sur/ace waler
<br /> little Reduction
<br /> Glound Dlain Sprini "
<br />Year waler ". Creek e~apoulion Total
<br />-- --
<br />1936--.. H4 7.2 0.7 8.' 109.9
<br />1937... 87.0 ,.. .7 8.' 101.7
<br />19l11.oo_.... 101.6 ,. .1 8.' 110.8
<br />193L. 81.9 I.' .7 8.' 98.7
<br />1940--.... 7Z.7 2.1 .7 8.' 84.1
<br />194L____ ... ____00__ 116.8 .., .7 .., 131.0
<br />1942.... 108.3 11.3 .7 .., 118.9
<br />1943.... . .. ......--. 79.4 U .7 .., 93.0
<br />194L. ............. 89.7 '.0 .7 .., 105.0
<br />194L.... .--.-------... 88.8 '.3 .7 .., 107.4
<br />1946... 73.9 3.3 .7 .., ".,
<br />1947____.... .,----,... 90.' 3.' .7 ., 104.0
<br />194L. .--,--,--..... 95.7 7.' .7 .., 111.8
<br />1949-... .. 92.7 12.9 .7 .., 114.9
<br />195D.-.__...__ .... It, 6.7 .7 .., 88.6
<br />195L._____ ----,..-- 63.9 2.7 .7 .., 75.9
<br />1952....... ".0 U .7 .., 97.8
<br />1953.__ ...----....... 87.4 7.0 .7 .., 103.7
<br />1954....._ --......... 65.4 2.1 .7 .., 76.8
<br />]9$5-.. ......_h_... 79.0 1.7 .7 .., 90.0
<br />19~m....._ 63.0 1.9 .7 .., 74.2
<br />1957..______... 107.2 ,.. .7 .., 121.9
<br />1958--____.__ Hll.9 12.2 .7 .. 123.4
<br />195L........ ____.u . ".3 3.7 .7 8.' 99.3
<br />I96L._ 79.S 3.6 .7 .., 92.4
<br />Mean_. "., ,., .7 .., 101.7
<br />
<br />HiV and L-itt/l' Sprin!l Creeks would provide :;urfllce wlltel' for sukuge,
<br />ns u portioll of their discharges I'cueh the sllh"age areH us surface flows
<br />during: the FeLrunry-~III?" perioo. .Big Spring' Creek enters Sun Luis
<br />Lake, find water from tllls source IS eventulllly lost through C\'llpOra-
<br />tion. The Illll0UIlt of Big Spring Creek flow llvnilllLle for salnlge is
<br />included in the cstimnted retluction in enlporntion discussed in the
<br />next IHlfll~~nlph. Little Spring' Creek discharges into playus sout.h of
<br />Sun Luis Lake, The flows of this strenm reuehing the salvnge nreu
<br />were menslIred periodicully in 19,58, Bn.:-ied upon these lieriodic
<br />mCllSllrements, it is estimnted in ttlble 6 that nil averuge of ubOllt 700
<br />acre-feet of wnter would be ll\'llilahle for sah"uge llllnlllllly from t.his
<br />source. The wuter would be carried to the ~Iain ConvevHnce Channel
<br />b\" 11 small feeder ditch. .
<br />. Heductioll -in tt'Clporation from fret~ wllter surfnces and suturnted
<br />-",oils \\"(lltld nl:,o result under the plnn of de\"elopmenL The lIfeU of free
<br />wuter surface within the slll\"tlge arCll u\"ernges Hhout. 2,400 llcres, in-
<br />eluding llbollt 850 HITeS lit SHn Luis Lake. There Hre al~o aLout 3,600
<br />neres which I1I1\"e n water tublf' utI or jll~t. slightly below. the surface
<br />of the ground. The sourn' of "-Hter is the f1oodflo\\"s of streams dis-
<br />{'hnrging into the Clo~ed Bll:,in, including the relath'e]y minor con-
<br />tributions of Bi~ Spring Creek to San Luis Luke. The 6,000 acres do
<br />not inl'lude ureas where the principal souree of wiltpr supply could be
<br />drain flow tllld operntioll wuste from the irrignted nreH or the surface
<br />f10\\" of Little Spring Creek,
<br />
|