Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000200 <br /> <br />So <br /> <br />PERIOD OF STUDY <br /> <br />The period of study for determination of the amount of water <br />salvageable from the Closed Busin is limited to 1936 through 1960 by <br />the estimates of the eastern rim inflow which could be deriw'd using <br />the llvailable discharge records~ The period of reliable' diversion <br />records from 1928 through 1960 was used ill thcJ)ortion of the llnlllysi~ <br />made to define the potential uses in Coloru 0 of the :-.;alvagt'able <br />water. <br /> <br />'VATER AVAIL....BLE FOR SALVAGE <br /> <br />Grcrund water <br /> <br />All of the ground waler reaching the sulvage arell, regardless of its <br />source, is dissipated by nonbenefici!ll cnlpotJ'IlJ1Spirntion. In lien <br />of such nonbeneficialuse, the same amount of water could be [{'moved <br />from the salvng:e nrNt by pumping without nffccting tlw hydrologic <br />balance of the Closed Basin. <br />The nonbeneficial use of ground wuter ill th- sulyugc llrCll is rf'- <br />flected in the fluctuation of the grollnd-wuter table. The U.S. Geo- <br />logical Survey, during their 1946-53 inve:-;tigatioIls, lll11illtained u <br />network of obServtltion wells in nIll! adjncent to the select.ed snlvage <br />area. Supplemented by un ndditionul 100 wplls, the obsernltions wen: <br />continued as pilrt of t.his investigution. Tho r{'cords of these ObSf'_ITU- <br />tion wells were carefully reviewed to select a limited number of key <br />wells, the fluctuations 'of which were n'pres{,lltl\tivt~ of t.he g:eneI'tl.l <br />fluctuation of tlw water tuble within till:' s(,lecteu 5lth"uge arell:. Such <br />key wells hnd to be so locnted thnt their records would Hut refl(~ct local <br />flu'ctuatiolls of the water table resulting from vnrious types of ::;urfaco <br />flows. Seven wells were determined to have records rppresentntive of <br />the genernl fluctuations of the wntpr tablt' throu~hollt t.he sulvngc <br />luell. <br />Drnwing 2.53-504-1832 pre.scnts a hydrograph for ',"ell .:\0. 152, <br />which is considered repn~sentntin~. This hydrogruph shows that during <br />the nongrowing season, when there "-as little or no enq>otrtmspiratioIl, <br />t.he elevation of the wlltrr tltblc rose rapidly. COIl\-ersely, dnring the <br />growing seu.....OI1, the elevation of t.he wat.er taLle diminished. By <br />extrapolating the nvemg(' rate of rist' during tho Ilongrm....ing season <br />throughout the growing s{'!lSOIl, nnd (~OITN:ting for till' change in wu,tpr- <br />tnble elentt.ion at the ('11(1 of the growing SCUSOIl, the Ulllllllll !lnd <br />average flIlnual net rise::; were drt.ermined for the seven wells, ,\ith <br />the nctulll work being done 011 hydrogruphs of lnrgL'r scale_ The net <br />rise thus determined represents depth of soil from which wuter was <br />removcd by evupotruIl:-,pirntion. To conn-rt the Ilel ri~l' to depth of <br />wllter, th(' net rise was multiplied by n ~atllratioIl index, which i~ <br />upproximntely ('qual to porosity minus wilting \wrcpntugt'. RCllre- <br />sentutin' suturntion indices were selt,(.!t'd and llpp ied to the portions <br />of tlw saln\ge urell to which tllt'Y Wen' llPplicabh'. The nununl ,.olumes <br />of eYnpotrnn~pirntion of gruund water within tilt' salvage afL'n during <br />calrndnr years 1949 through 1957 llrp computed in htbles 4 /lnd 5_ <br />