Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~tHlu H~ <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />11<", <br />Access road, gravel, 14 feet wide, ~)milelong_____+______+___________ <br />Boat-launching ramp. gravel, 30 feet by 12 fecL____________________ <br />Parking area, grn\'d, 2.5 ullits___________________________._________ <br />Well, 100 feet deep_ _ _ __ _ n_ _ _ __u__ _ _ _ n_ _____ _ ___._ _ __ _ __ ___ _ __ <br />Sanitary facilities, concrete, pit type. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ ___ <br />Engineering, administration, and supervision_____ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ ___ <br />contingencies_ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ ___ _.n _ __.__n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ n_ _ _ n_ _ _ __ <br /> <br />TABLE 3.-C03t of ji8hing facilities at San Luu Lake <br /> <br />eN, <br />$10, 000 <br />5, 000 <br />2000 <br />1: 000 <br />2, 000 <br />5,000 <br />5, 000 <br /> <br />TotaL _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ 30, 000 <br />Annual O.M. &: R_______________________________________________ 1,000 <br /> <br />Fishing associated with these facilities "..-ould amount to 10,000 <br />man-days for a benefit oC $15,000 annually. <br />Trout hatching and rearing facilities operated by the Colorado <br />Division of Game, Fish llnd Parks llnd the Bureau of Sport Fisheries <br />and 'Vildlife in this general nreR presently are inadequate due to limited <br />water supplies of suitable quality and quantity. Establishment of hatch- <br />ery and rearin~ units ,,,'ithin the project area would enhance fish- <br />cultural operatIons. Use of the water would be almost entirely 110n- <br />consumptive and would not affect the feasibility of the project. <br />'Vater quality and site studies Illn'e been made to determine the <br />suitability of project water and land for fish rearing facilities and <br />these studies indicate stn'eral problems which remain unsolVl'd at this <br />time. Of paramount importance is water quality which cannot be as- <br />sessed accuratelv until the wells have been in operation for some time. <br />Other problemsw ure conveyance of water at suitable temperatures to <br />the hatchery sites und the extremely low gradient of the project urea. <br />I( the well water should need to be convc)"cd in pipes below the frost <br />line, the cost might be prohibitive. The determination of the feasibility <br />of hatcheries must be deferred until stages 1 !wd 2 of the project fire in <br />operation. A recommendation could possibly then be made as to the <br />inclusion of State and Federlll fish hatcheries and the necessary water <br />supply facilities. W <br />About 100,000 acres of sensonally flooded wetlands would be drained <br />by the project with a consequent large loss of waterfowl hahitnt. This <br />loss would be of national significnnce and should be replaced nt prol' eel, <br />cost. A pi un combining the st.age 5 well field llnd !1. national wilt life <br />refuge, to be known as the :\lishnk N'ntionnl '\~ildlife Refuge, offers <br />an opportunity to salvngc wnwI' IUHf also replacC' loss of waterfowl <br />habitat through a coordinat.ed multiple use operation. <br />The refuge would comprise about 13,SOO ncres of land, including the <br />:\fishuk Lakes water nrens shown on plate 11. There are about 2,300 <br />acres of Federal lands ndminist.('rC'd by the Burellu of Land :\llluage- <br />ment, 4,500 acres of land in the sta~(' 5 wt'll field, and about 7,000 acres <br />of privately owned lands that should be acquired at nn estimated cost <br />of $350,000, and ~hould be made u\"ailable to the Secretarv of the <br />Interior uuder the terms of a general plan !IS provided in srction 3 of <br />the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 SIaL 401, as amended; <br />16 U_S.C, 661 eJ seq,), <br />Several intermittentstreams enter the proposed refll~e from the north <br />and west. The ('astern one-half of the aren contaill~ n blrge number of <br />small lakes and potholes which receive water from surface and sub- <br />