Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />, . lJ0013JJ <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />Due to its fluctuating "...ater level, San Luis Lake provides mediocre <br />quality fishing and would support about 1 ,000 man-days annually. The <br />Rio Grand{' is a poor trout stream from the mouth of La .Jara Creek to <br />the Colorado-New ~lcxico State line. Upstream diversions seriously <br />Ocwfiter the stream during the late summer months. During the <br />months of August, Septemhf'r, nnd October flows averuge only about <br />50 second-f('(~t at tlw Lobatos Gng(>, 6 milps ahon.\ the StatE.' line. <br />Extremes of record at the gage from June 1899 to 1968 have varied <br />(rom zero flows for short periods in 1950, 1951, and 1956, to a maximum <br />of 13,000 second-Ceet. Other than thesc"thmc low-flow yoars the mini- <br />mum flow has uvpraged 26 second~feet. \Vithout the project, fishing on <br />this 32-mile n'ach would be 1,000 man-days annually. <br />III New ~fcxico the 76 miles of the Rio Grande from thl) State line <br />to tho mouth of the Rio Cham a g-eru'rollv lire fish(.d quih' heavily <br />despit(. the fuet thut most of the stream is inac(',('ssible due to steep <br />('anYon walls or the lack of roads. About 50 mil('s of this r('uch h11V(' <br />be(~ll designnted ItS it component of the .:\ntional "~ild llnd Scenic <br />River SYstem bv The 'Vild and Sc('nic Rivers At.t (82 Stut. 906- <br />918). Fishing on~the 76 mil('s of tht\ Rio Grunde wilhin .!\t.w ~lexico <br />would nverngc about 15,500 man-days annually. <br /> <br />With the project <br />San Luis Lnke would become more manageahle as a ('old-water <br />fishery due to the constant inflow of cold wnler and stable ele\'lltion <br />with ;1 surffice areu ,"nrying from 860 to 900 neres. Sllituble species of <br />fish would be stocked in the lake by the Colornda division of game, <br />fish tllld parks. Fishing over the period of anlllysis elm be expected to <br />nn:!rage about 15.000 man-days annUlllly. <br />In some plllces the main cOIl"eyance channel would be bordered <br />only by stunted vegetation. Such a :-:;etting would not attrllct large <br />numbers of fishermen. 'Vith u compacted earth lining. the channel <br />would not produce aquutic organisms in sufficient quantities to sust.ain <br />u satisfactory fish population. The channel could be managed only us <br />a put-and-take cold-wat('r fishery on a limited basis. If stocked with <br />catchable-3ized trout. ll.\Pcrd.ge lmntnl fi~hing on the 39 mile~ of <br />channel cnn be expect.ed to total 2,000 man-days annuully. <br />Project operation would increase the flows of the Rio Grande down- <br />stream from the mouth of the convcynnce channel by a minimum of <br />100 second-feet, The minimum flow would be incrcasN! from 26 <br />second-feet t.o ]26 second-feet and the llverage flow would incrense <br />from 50 second-feet to 150 second~r(,l't from August through Octob('r. <br />The Rio Grande in Colorado would impro,"c in quality nnd be fisht'd <br />for much longer periods than it would without the~e incr('asNI flow~. <br />Fishing would be about 4,000 man-days annuall..... nIl increase of 3,000 <br />man-davs. on the 32 miles of the Rio Grande' in Colorado. <br />The slllvtlfed water would impron' the trout habitat of tht' Rio <br />Grande in :';cw ~I('xil'o llnd result in nn increID'C' in fishing. Fishing 011 <br />thp Rio Grande within l\~ew ~fexieo would be 25,000 mllll-dIlYS, nn <br />inereusp of 9,500 lIw.n-dll\":; llnnuulh.. <br />Table 1 summarizes fishing thai would be ('xpectrd without the <br />project llnd with the project. <br />