Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OCG.~2S <br /> <br />112 <br /> <br />TABLE 17.-POTENTlAl USE OF SALVAGED WATER TO R[OUCE IRRIGATION SHORTAGES IN THE RIO GRANDE <br />DIVISION UNDER CONDITION OF FUll SURFACE WATER DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONEJOS AND RIO CRANDE <br />DIVISIONS <br /> <br />[Unlt-I,OOOacre-l<<tl <br /> <br />Calendar year <br /> <br />Ideal <br />di~ersjon <br />demand <br /> <br />Potential <br />deliveries <br />orsalvaUd <br />(found water <br />and drain flow <br /> <br />Tolal <br />diversions <br />witll use 01 <br />salvaged waler <br /> <br />Routed <br />diversions <br /> <br />Diversion <br />delicienq <br /> <br />1928....___.-. <br />1929.____..... .,"._____.__ <br />l!}J0u..__.____ <br />1931......__... <br />i932..h. <br />1931.....___. <br />1934____________.___ <br />1935..__ u+._., <br />1936... moo.. <br />1937___ ........ <br />1938......._. _P__.. <br />1939.___...__._____.__._... <br />1940________..________..___ <br />19"1 <br />1942:::::::-:::::::::::---- <br />mL-- --..----... <br />1945..::..::-:::::::::::::: <br />1946.__..____ _______.____ <br />1947_____ m________ <br />1948._____ "..._________ <br />19..9.....------------.--.- <br />1950..______._.___________. <br />1951.._........._.__._.___. <br />'952___________..___..._... <br />}9S3_.._..._......_.....__. <br />t9s..._____________....___._ <br />1955...._.______________._ <br />19:>6___....._.......___.__ <br />1957__..________.._._.__.. <br />}9S8.__.__._.____._..... <br />}9S9..___..........__.._.. <br />1960_.___.__..__...... <br /> <br />S93.4 <br />&07.0 <br />590.3 <br />598.9 <br />616.3 <br />S9S.2 <br />"".2 <br />623.0 <br />600.6 <br />609.8 <br />609.0 <br />616.1 <br />613.4 <br />&OLS <br />620.9 <br />611.1 <br />"'.1 <br />&07.2 <br />618.0 <br />&03.8 <br />597.5 <br />597.8 <br />622.9 <br />619.7 <br />606.6 <br />618.8 <br />633." <br />621.6 <br />623.1 <br />621.0 <br />62U <br />609.7 <br />626.3 <br />610.9 <br /> <br />S93.4 <br />&07.0 <br />590.3 <br />566.6 <br />616.3 <br />S9S.2 <br />503.3 <br />606.5 <br />553.6 <br />572.5 <br />609.0 <br />616.1 <br />196.l <br />585.4 <br />620.9 <br />611.1 <br />"'.1 <br />607.2 <br />601.8 <br />603.8 <br />597.5 <br />597.8 <br />622.9 <br />40U <br />"".6 <br />618.1 <br />311.1 <br />370.9 <br />325.8 <br />591.1 <br />621.4 <br />555.0 <br />626.3 <br />562.7 <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />32.3 <br />o <br />o <br />102.9 <br />16.5 <br />47.0 <br />31.3 <br />o <br />o <br />211.1 <br />16.1 <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />16.2 <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />218.3 <br />o <br />0.7 <br />261.7 <br />2~.7 <br />297_3 <br />23.9 <br />o <br />5U <br />o <br />48.3 <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />32.3 <br />o <br />o <br />101.0 <br />18." <br />41.0 <br />31.3 <br />o <br />o <br />84.0 <br />130.3 <br />18.9 <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />16.2 <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />7".7 <br />9U <br />51.0 <br />12.6 <br />86.0 <br />u... <br />123.7 <br />122.7 <br />98.6 <br />91.7 <br />..1.6 <br /> <br />593.4 <br />607.0 <br />590.3 <br />S98.9 <br />616.3 <br />S95.2 <br />604.3 <br />624.9 <br />600.6 <br />609.8 <br />609.0 <br />616.1 <br />"80.3 <br />115.7 <br />639.8 <br />611.1 <br />"'.1 <br />601.2 <br />618.0 <br />603.8 <br />597.5 <br />597.8 <br />622.9 <br />"16.1 <br />699.9 <br />669.1 <br />444.3 <br />456.9 <br />400.2 <br />120.8 <br />7RI <br />653.6 <br />118.0 <br />604.3 <br /> <br />Mean_____ <br /> <br />Tohl; <br />1928-53......____ <br />195-4--60.......... <br /> <br />15,804.1 <br />4.356.5 <br /> <br />15.099.1 <br />3,468.2 <br /> <br />70(.4 <br />888.3 <br /> <br />70(.4 <br />669.1 <br /> <br />15.8lJ4.1 <br />".137.9 <br /> <br />As shown in tuble 16, it. was not possible to fully meet the ideal <br />irrigntion din>rsion df'mund of the Rio Grnlldt~ DidsioTl in all yenrs <br />of the study. During the period 1928-1960. t}w diversions averaged <br />48.200 llCTt>-feet less thnn thc ideal divcrsion (IeOland. The diversion <br />defit'il'ncies l'ould be Inffrely offset b.'" use of ~mknged wlltpr. The <br />potelltinluse of sulvug'ed ground wuter nnt! drnin flow is indicnted in <br />tllble 17 to Ilverage 41. 600 ncre-feet per yt'tlr when sneh snknged wutl'r <br />is llntilable from tilt' snh-ll~t. IUt~IL In t'olll)luting tlw pott>lltial IlSI' of <br />snkuged wuter in tllbll' 17. it was asslIlllPd thut if tllt' din>rsioll dt~- <br />ficif'IH'Y could not 1w (ully offset by the U:-i(' of snh-ng"t'd wnter within <br />the ,n'ur lhpn (It>lin>ry of :-iulnlg'l'd wlltt>r would continllP in the sub- <br />SNI'H'Ut .n'llI" or Yt'ur::; until till' slmllow ground watl'r in tlll' irrigllted <br />llrpa hud bl'ell flllly rl'pll'ni~hl'd. Undl'r this Ilssumption. till' din;rsioll <br />drfit'il'IlCY could bt, fully off:-'l't from 1925 through 195a. Additional <br />liSt' of :-,ah'lIgt'd wlltt'r would he rl'quirl>d subsequent to 1960 to offset <br />tilt' Illrgt' din>rsiOll dl'fkiellcy which IItTrul'd frolll 1954 through 1959. <br />lllld tilt' pott'ntial liSt' of "'lllnlg'l'd Wlltl>r would lH'('ollll' equllI to tllt' <br />din'rsillll dl'fit'it'Jl('.\' us ill till' 1925-19;):~ pt.rind. "~ith ('onrdillutioll <br />l)l't'H.t~1I tilt' din>rsillns fWIll tht. Hitl nrand" :md till' IIse flf :->ulnlO't'd <br />watt'r, the di~triblltion of \b{' of :->lllntgl.d wtllt'r would hI' :->ollll'whllt <br />