Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000229 <br /> <br />Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />SPDSS Discussion Items <br />March 20, 2002 <br /> <br /># Item Comments as Recorded bv Rav Bennett <br />I Denver Basin GW OK <br /> Modeling <br />2 Irrigated Acreage OK for acreage and crop type. Close [>, <br /> Mapping cooperation needed to accurately tag water <br /> supplv (surface and ground) <br />3 GIS OK. Many base coverages are readily <br /> available. <br />4 Database Uodates OK I- <br />S South Platte OK in WD 64 (Washington County). ( ~ <br /> Alluvial Modeling Question need upstream and tribs. <br />6 Surface Water Question need. <br /> Model <br />7 CU Modeling OK for planning. Concerned if applied to <br /> well augmentation <br />8 Administration OK. Very strong proponent of better data <br /> Tool accesses (e.g. real time, etc.) <br />9 Training Programs OK for some (database, GIS, Admin Tool). <br /> Not sure for others > (No <br />10 User Involvement Critical <br />II New Surface OK ifthey help with administration and/or 3 <br /> Water Gages states. <br />12 New ground water OK if money is available <br /> Wells in the <br /> Denver Basin <br />13 New ground water OK if and only if existing wells are <br /> wells in the South unavailable. <br /> Platte <br /> <br />c: \wlriogrande\wordlMt020325 .doc <br /> <br />p,f ~7 k.? <br /> <br />we. 7''''/ ___//.d \ <br />w P1..de0 ",,I/I'''''ple CV <br /> <br />03/25/02 - 3 <br />