Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., - <br />'''I ~"'.' . ~~. :, ;-, '1-' .~. . . . ,- - . ,. ~ "t-. . <br /> <br />. f <br />l <br /> <br />IJU2823 <br />TABLE 3. COMPARISONS OF ESTIMATED (U) VS MEASURED (ET) CONSUMPTIVE USE. MM, FOR KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS. <br /> <br /> Laramie. Wr WheaUand. WY Fort Comns, CO Northglenn, CO Santa Ana, CA <br />Month u ET u ET u ET u ET u ET <br />Ap> 69 68 88 100 106 10. <br />May 101 11' 126 12' 136 103 <br />'un 137 166 161 146 13' 172 160 156 16' 131 <br />July 157 163 181 168 178 152 . 18. 190 168 169 <br />Au, 128 13. 146 12' 1.6 "6 161 153 154 145 <br />s,p 91 93 106 113 111 109 117 136 123 108 <br />0<1 56 59 68 70 66 60 97 77 <br />Season 739 806 873 856 569 679 678 715 937 837 <br /> 8% Underestimate 2% Overestimate 2% Underestimate 5% Underestimate 12% Overestimate <br />. Estimated values eidculated ustng'kt of equation (e). <br /> <br />TABLE 4. STATISTICS COMPARING DIFFERENCES. MM, BETWEEN MONTHLY MEASURED ET AND CALCULATED ET FOR <br />KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS USING (1) THE ORIGINAL SCS-BC USING ke VALUES FOR PASTURE GRASS; (2) THE SCS.BC <br />METHOD WITH CALIBRATED ke AND kt VALUES AND (3) AS IN 2 ABOVE BUT WITH AN ELEVATION ADJUSTMENT OF <br />9.1% PER 1000 M ELEVATION INCLUDED (FOR THE FIVE LOCATIONS LARAMIE. WHEATLAND. <br />FORT COLLINS. NORTHGLENN. AND SANTA ANA). <br /> <br /> Meuul't!d V1 SCS-BC <br /> Measured vs SCS-BC with caUbrated <br /> Measured vs original with calibrated kt and kc <br /> SCS.BC kt and kc and elev adj <br /> Mean St. dv. Mean St. dv. Mean St. dv. <br /> Month diff oCdiff diU oCdifC dlff of dlff <br /> Ap, 36.3 13.6 9.0 6.2 13.3 2,6 <br /> M.y 33.3 29.9 15.3 15.6 7.3 6.8 <br /> 'un 30.2 28.0 19.6 14.8 14.4 13.1 <br /> 'u1 19.8 20.3 14.4 11.4 16.4 9.8 <br />j Au, 14.2 12.2 7_8 8.7 7.8 9.3 <br />s,p 22.0 11.2 9.0 7.7 6.' 6.3 <br /> 0" 27.3 15.2 9.8 8.7 6.8 6.8 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Crop growth stage coefficients (k,) were then <br />recalculated to account for the loop effect between <br />monthly temperatures and monthly consumptive use <br />coefficients as discussed by the SCS (1.967). Crop growth <br />stage coefficients - averaged for the five sites - are <br />given in Table 2. The seasonal variation of these <br />coefficients form the typical bell-shaped curves depicted <br />by the SCS. <br />The calibrated crop growth stage. coefficients of <br />Table 2 were used to estimate consumptive use of <br />Kentucky bluegrass at the five sites for which the original <br />measurements were obtained. The estimated <br />consumptive use values (u) are compared with the actual <br />measured values (ET) in Table 3. Assuming a perfect fit <br />of the calibrated data, the estimated consumptive use <br />values should perfectly match the measured values. <br />However, at the higher elevation site (Laramie) an <br />underestimation occurs while at the lowest elevation site <br />(Santa Ana) an overestimation occurs. At the <br />intermediate elevation sites (Wheatland, Fort Collins <br />and Northglenn) the estimated and measured <br />consumptive use values compare rather closely. Basically <br />lhe results support the premise that SCS Blaney Criddle <br />estimates of reference crop ET values should be adjusted <br />upward with increasing elevation above sea level. <br />However, in this case the adjustment is not with respect <br />to sea level. An upward or downward adjustment should <br />be made depending on whether the location at which <br />estimates are being calculated has an elevation which is <br />greater or lower, respectively. than the location at which <br />lhe formula is. calibrated. For example, the average <br />coefficients of Table 2 apply without elevation <br />adjustment at an elevation of 1350 m. For Kentucky <br />bluegrass. for the season (April through October) our <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br /> <br />1984- TRANSACTtONS of the ASAE <br /> <br />estimates give a 9.4% adjustment per 1000 m elevation <br />and for the summer months (June through August) this <br />adjustment is 7.6%. Thus if seasonal ET estimates are <br />being made at an location having an elevation of 2350 m <br />and using the coefficients of Table 2, then an upward <br />adjustment of 9.4% should be applied. Likewise, <br />estimates at 350 m elevation should be adjusted <br />downward 9.4 0/., etc. f <br />The authors strongly urge local calibration when using <br />the SCS Blaney Criddle. As shown in Table 4, <br />calibration of the SCS.Blaney Criddle for Kentucky <br />bluegrass improved the ET estimates for the five <br />locations considered herein. Application of the elevation <br />adj,!stments for estimating consumptive use of lawn <br />grass in Wyoming will use the SCS Blaney Criddle <br />method calibrated at Laramie and Whealland. <br />Estimates at other locations will use the calibrated values <br />for either Laramie or Wheatland and elevation <br />adjustments based on the differences between the <br />elevation of Laramie or WheatJand and the elevation of <br />the site in question. <br /> <br />Alfalfa <br />Alfalfa consumptive use data were obtained from the <br />literature for the nine sites listed in Table 5. These sites <br />were selected based on availability of data to give a <br />comparision and/or confirmation of the elevation <br />adjustments which were determined for bluegrass. The <br />main criteria was to have sites with a wide elevation <br />range. Unlike the bluegrass data, the alfalfa data for the <br />different sites were not collected during the same years or <br />even using the same procedures. <br />The procedure used for bluegrass was applied to the <br />alfalfa data. The computed temperature coefficient was <br /> <br />127 <br />