Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2241 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />INDIAN WATER IN MODERN TRIBAL POUCYMAKlNG <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />1-5. CONCLUSION <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Recently, tribal leaders have had to deal with outside institutions, mainly the <br />Congress and the couns in order to solidify tribal powers and resource rights. In the <br />years to come, tribal councils are likely to give increasing anemion to internal tribal <br />structures in order to consolidate and to build upon the achievements of the modern <br />era. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Water management will be central to this process for most tribes. Water is <br />simply too imponant to Indian Country to be lost by default. This Handbook is <br />addressed to that spirit and to the emerging corps of tribal water managers. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />REFERENCE NOTES <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. 25 U.S.c. ~~ 331-381. <br />2. 25 U.S.C. 99 461-479. <br />3. Act of August 15. 1953. ch. 505. 67 Slat. 588 (section 7 repealed and reenacted as amended in <br />1968) (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. 9 1162 (1982). 25 U.S.C. 99 1321-1325 (1982) (28 <br />U.S.c. 9 1360 (1982)). <br />4. 358 U.S. 217. 79 S. Ct. 269. 3 L.Ed.2d 251 (1959). <br />5. 43 U.S.C. H 1601-1628. <br />6. 25 U.S.C. H 903,903f. <br />7. 25 U.S.C. is 450a-45Oo. <br />8. 25 U.S.C. 991901-1963. <br />9. S.1. Res. 102, 95th Con8.. 2d Sess" Pub. L. No. 95-341. 92 Slat. 469 (codified in part aI 42 U.S.C. <br />9 1996 & Note). <br />10. 373 U.S. 546 (1963). 83 S. Cl. 1468. 10 L.Ed.2d 542, decree enwed, 376 U.S. 340 (1964). <br />11. Washington v, Washington Stale Commercial Passenger FislUng Vessel Ass',., 443 U.S. 658. 99 S. <br />Cl. 3055. 61 L.Ed.2d823 (1979). <br />12. See. e.g., Counry ofO~ldo v, O~lda Indian Nallon, 470 U.S. 226.105 S. Cl. 1245.84 L.Ed,2d <br />169 (1985). <br />13. Colorado River Conservalion Dislrict v. United Stales, 424 U.S. 800. 96 S. Cl. 1236,47 L.Ed.2d <br />483 (1976). <br />14. Arizona v. San Carlos ApacM Tribe of Arizona, 463 U.S. 545, 103 S. Cl. 3201. 77 L.Ed.2d 837 <br />(1983). <br />15. OlipJuw v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, 435 U.S. 191,98 S. Cl. 1011. 55 L.Ed.2d 209 (1978). <br />16. 455 U.S. 130, 102 S. Cl. 894, 71 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982). <br />17. [d. at 455 U.S. 137-38, 102 S. Ct. 901-02 (Cilations omined). <br />18. United States National Water Comm'n. Water Policies <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SUGGESTED READINGS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />For concise trea.ttnem of federal-tribal policy. see Angie Debe, A History of tM Indians of the <br />UniJed Slales (University of Oklahoma Press, 1970); Wilcomb Washburn. The Indian in America <br />(Harper & Row, 1975); and Vine Deloria. Jr.. Clifford M. Lylle, TM No/ions Within: The Past and <br />Fuzllre of American Indian Sovereignty (Pantheon Books. 1984). Also recommended are Francis Paul <br />