Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1438 <br /> <br />Therefore, it was not necessary to perform any operational studies <br /> <br />involving storage reservoirs. <br /> <br />D.4.3 Cropping Pattern <br /> <br /> <br />For the preliminary analysis of PIA, a cropping pattern with the <br /> <br /> <br />highest net agricultural returns was used. Table D.2 identifies <br /> <br /> <br />this cropping pattern as well as the net agricultural return. The <br /> <br /> <br />parcels in the Navajo Watershed are located in climatic zone J. <br /> <br />D.4.4 Preliminary PIA Analysis <br />A preliminary PIA analysis was performed comparing a parcel's <br />payment capacity with a preliminary estimate of the cost to pump <br />water from the river to the pat'cel. This preliminary watet' cost was <br />based on the static pumping lift (the diffet'ence in elevation from <br />the water sut'face in the t'iver to the elevation of the parcel) for <br />gt'avity irrigated fields or plus a field delivet'y pressure of 60 psi <br />for sprinkler irrigation. The Navajo River, which would supply <br />water to the pat'cels in the Navajo watershed, is located to the east <br /> <br />and south of the Southet'n Ute Reset'vation. The water surface <br /> <br />elevation was taken at the point in Colorado where the river comes <br /> <br />closest to the reset'vation. The water surface elevation at this <br /> <br />location is higher than a point further downstream in New Mexico that <br />would be closer to the t'eservation lands. Detailed tabulations of <br />the analysis are shown in Appendix D.l. None of the parcels in the <br />Navajo Watershed had a positive t'esidual payment capacity. Table <br />D.3 summarizes the results of the analysis. <br /> <br />9 <br />