Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0017J6 <br /> <br />12. Comparison with Historical Data <br /> <br />This section presents the procedures and results of a model verification <br />study. The study consisted of comparing historical flow and salt data <br />with flow and salt data output from a CRSS computer run. The purpose of <br />the study was to verify accuracy of the data and assumptions used in the <br />CRSS, and to provide insight into the areas of the data files and model <br />that may need improvement or adjustment. <br /> <br />12.1 Data and Procedures <br /> <br />The period chosen to compare historically recorded flow and salt values <br />with CRSS simulated flow and salt values is 1968 to 1983. The advan- <br />tages for choosing this period are (1) all reservoirs modeled by the <br />CRSS are operational, (2) the available historic data is continuous, and <br />(3) the period is sufficiently long enough to span a wide range of <br />naturally occurring hydrologic events. The main disadvantage is that <br />this period includes the filling of Lake Powell. <br /> <br />Historically recorded flow and salt data were taken from the "Quality of <br />Water Progress Reports." Simulated flow and salt data were generated by <br />the CRSM. The hydrology input data used in the simulation were the <br />natural flow and salt hydrology data base for the period 1968-1983. It <br />should be noted that the 1981-1983 data are provisional at this time. <br /> <br />Depletions for the simulation were taken from the "Colorado River System <br />Consumptive Uses and Losses" reports. The annual values given in the <br />reports were averaged for the Upper and Lower Basins, and the average <br />values were entered into the CRSM as constant values over the 1968-1983 <br />period. Upper Basin depletions were held constant at 3,047,000 acre- <br />feet and Lower Basin depletions were held constant at 6,133,000 acre- <br />feet. In addition to the above depletions, 514,000 acre-feet of <br />depletions were scheduled for native vegetation and losses from the <br />Senator Wash Dam, Reservoir, and Pumping-generating facility; and <br />1,515,000 acre-feet of depletions were scheduled for delivery to Mexico. <br />Evaporation is not included in the depletion schedule since it is <br />accounted for by the CRSM. <br /> <br />Bank storage computations at Lake Powell were modified to more accu- <br />rately reflect what occurred during the filling period. Change in bank <br />storage was modeled at a rate of 15 percent of the change in reservoir <br />contents for 1968-1979, and at a rate of 8 percent for 1980-1983. The <br />bank storage rate modeled at Lake Mead was 6.5 percent. <br /> <br />Initial reservoir contents were set equal to the contents historically <br />recorded on December 31, 1967. Initial reservoir salt concentrations <br />were set equal to the salt concentrations historically recorded during <br />December 1967, in the river below each reservoir. . No surplus strategy <br />was used during the CRSM simulation. In order to more accurately simu- <br />late the historical release patterns caused by day to day operations of <br />the river system, the monthly reservoir contents in the CRSS simulation <br />were forced to match the historically recorded end-of-month contents. <br /> <br />54 <br />